The primary agenda item was the public hearing for file number 250-11163, concerning proposed renovations at the TPC Boston golf course, specifically affecting holes 10 and 2. The representative from BS and Thomas outlined the modifications, which are part of an ongoing master planning process for the course. Key components of the proposal included buffer zone work, footbridge installation with associated wetland replication, and layout changes to improve playability.

The proposed footbridge for hole 2 sparked discussion. The alteration aims to straighten the layout for enhanced playability, with a keen focus on increasing wetland habitat in the impacted area. The representative asserted that the project would result in a higher rate of mitigation than the area impacted, with a replication area of about 7,000 square feet compared to an impact of 1,750 square feet for the bridge. Commission members raised several questions about the ecological implications, including the potential effects on riparian habitats.

John Thomas, the Conservation Director, clarified that the area was not within a mapped riparian corridor. The discussion also touched on the management of vegetation around the ponds, which were man-made and primarily serve as aesthetic features and wildlife habitats. The commission expressed approval of the club’s approach to enhancing natural habitats while ensuring compliance with conservation regulations.

Another topic was the application of pesticides, insecticides, and fertilizers near a pond, emphasizing the need for minimal application in areas close to water bodies. Concerns were raised regarding fertilizer leach back into the area, with assurances that best management practices would address these issues. The greens are sand-based and have internal drainage systems, with drainage outfalls located approximately 100 yards from the fairway, none of which drain directly into a pond.

The commission also delved into the cumulative impacts of the golf course’s construction, referencing an earlier request for documentation on the total area impacted, specifically the 5,000 square feet limit for the site. Questions were posed about the walkway construction for hole two, including whether it would be pile-supported and the materials to be used. Detailed grading plans for greens 2, 7, and 10 were requested, emphasizing the importance of civil engineering to ensure compliance with standards.

Further debate arose regarding the wetland impact of the proposed footpath. The discussion centered on the functions and values of the affected wetland, with questions about how the impact would be offset by replication efforts. The existing Bordering Vegetated Wetland (BVW) was characterized by a mix of shrub saplings, while the proposed replication was expected to include open water and shrub-scrub wetland. Concerns were voiced about the ecological value difference between the existing BVW and the proposed open water area. A commission member emphasized the need for a analysis, stating, “I don’t want 5,000 of open water; we’re really not getting 7,000 of BVW.”

Next on the agenda was the public hearing for file number 250-11164 regarding a septic system replacement on North Washington Street. The consulting engineers presented the project, which involves replacing a failed septic system for a four-bedroom house. The proposed plan includes a 1500-gallon septic tank and leaching field, maintaining a distance of over 50 feet from the surrounding wetlands. The project also involves removing existing sheds and a paved walkway, along with installing sedimentation control measures such as a silt sock around the work area. All disturbed areas will be loamed and seeded after construction.

The commission’s attention then turned to file number 250-1162 regarding the construction of a proposed 30,000 square-foot industrial building. The representative provided a project update and plans, which include a paved area and a gravel laydown space with minimal vehicle traffic. Concerns were raised about snow removal practices, with assurances that plowing would be conducted carefully to avoid disturbing the ground.

Conditions for any issued orders were discussed to prevent unauthorized vehicle storage within that boundary.