The most pressing topic of the evening was the discussion and subsequent approval of an amendment to the fence height ordinance. Vice Chairman Thomas Jones spearheaded the review of three land use ordinances, focusing primarily on Land Use 1541, which proposed raising the maximum fence height to six feet. The amendment aimed to align the local fence height regulations with construction codes, prompting a detailed examination of potential ripple effects on other ordinances.

One of the points of contention revolved around fences abutting paper streets. A concern was raised about the potential for these streets to be developed in the future, which could lead to visibility issues if six-foot fences were allowed. The board debated whether to treat these paper streets similarly to corner lots, restricting fence heights to four feet to maintain sightlines. The existing language allowed a six-foot fence if the township engineer determined no plans for the paper street, but the participants considered modifying these restrictions to avoid future complications.

The board reached a consensus that existing properties should be treated more leniently, viewing paper streets as side yards instead of front yards. This practical approach aimed to balance property owners’ interests with long-term planning considerations. Ultimately, the Vice Chairman sought to finalize the fence height adjustments, with an agreement to revisit retaining wall issues in future meetings.

Following this, the board turned its attention to the extension request for a minor subdivision on Basking Ridge Road. The applicants’ attorney requested an extension of the 190-day filing period due to delays in negotiations with the Morris County Planning Board. The board discussed the request’s duration, noting that the 60-day extension did not align with the original 190-day period. Clarification was sought on the reasoning behind the proposed timeline, with the attorney suggesting the extension be granted for the full duration as the applicants were diligently pursuing the necessary approvals.

Board members debated the necessity of requiring documentation for delays, recognizing the importance of ensuring that extensions are not granted indefinitely without checks on the applicants’ diligence. The implications of the extension were also considered, particularly concerning any potential changes in the subdivision plans due to ongoing negotiations. The board attorney assured that the forthcoming resolution for the extension would include language ensuring it is subject to all the same conditions as the original approval.

A motion was made and seconded to grant the extension until November 9, 2024, with the resolution to be memorialized at the next meeting. The board voted in favor.

The meeting also delved into signage regulations, specifically concerning home office signage. The committee reduced the proposed sign size from two square feet to one square foot by two feet, allowing for flexibility in design. Illuminated signs were debated, with the need for clarification on permissible lighting types for residential business signs.

The topic of residential sheds was another focal point, with discussions on increasing the maximum allowable size from 100 to 200 square feet. The board considered various lot sizes, height restrictions, and setbacks, emphasizing the need to prevent excessive shed accumulation on smaller lots. A proposal emerged to limit the number of sheds based on lot size, suggesting a threshold of half an acre for allowing two sheds, though opinions varied on this limitation.

Operational regulations for sheds were also examined, including prohibiting plumbing or sewer connections and allowing electric and internet connections. The board discussed how to establish fair regulations based on property dimensions, emphasizing clarity and consistency across different zoning districts.

The discussion on impervious coverage highlighted concerns over runoff issues, particularly for properties in flood zones. The board considered removing credits for impervious coverage associated with sheds, noting that water falling onto a shed’s roof contributes to runoff. The conversation underscored the need for further engineering insights to confirm the feasibility of proposed regulations.

Lastly, the board discussed ongoing projects and upcoming applications, including a minor site plan for additional paving on Myersville Road and a variance request for a bull statue. The chair emphasized the importance of board member attendance at meetings to support applicants.