Ryken provided detailed exhibits to support his claims, emphasizing that the terrain and grading had changed over the years, preventing proper water flow as originally intended. He highlighted discrepancies in elevation between his property and his neighbor’s, showing that the water no longer drains as it did when the culvert was installed. Ryken also referenced the Minnesota Public Drainage Manual, which obligates the city to ensure drainage systems function correctly, potentially bolstering his case.

The city attorney advised that in light of the potential litigation, questions and comments should be directed through proper legal channels rather than an open forum to avoid complications. Despite this, Ryken clarified he had not made any formal threats but had consulted an attorney regarding the issue.

In other council business, there was a brief mention of upcoming absentee voting starting on September 20th. Additionally, the city engineer reported that ongoing street projects were nearing completion, with only striping left to be done. The council also scheduled a special meeting for September 30th to expedite the award of a construction bid for the Theo Creek restoration project.