The proposal for a new dog park dominated the discussion, with members emphasizing the need for preliminary design work and cost assessments before moving forward. The council agreed that the first step would involve presenting the concept for approval, which would allow staff to gather the necessary information. This initial approval would not equate to immediate funding but would enable the exploration of grants and other funding sources.

A potential location for the dog park was identified on an acre and a half of land just outside the current meeting space. This site features a slight slope but is manageable and includes existing trees and nearby parking. Safety was a primary concern, with suggestions for a tall fence and a double-gated entrance to prevent dogs from escaping. The idea of using aesthetically pleasing materials, such as wrought iron fencing, was proposed to create a welcoming environment that aligns with the community’s character.

Accessibility and amenities were also key points of discussion. Members considered whether to include a bathroom facility, debating between a portable restroom and the current absence of restroom facilities in nearby parks. Signage warning drivers of the dog park ahead was suggested to improve safety for both dogs and pedestrians.

The council also discussed the design aspects of the dog park, proposing a separation for small and large dogs, with about a quarter of the space allocated for small breeds and the remaining for larger breeds. ADA compliance was highlighted as a priority, with a proposal to create at least one ADA-compliant sitting area within the park. The necessity of phased development for pathways and seating was acknowledged due to the challenging terrain. Waste management was another concern, with recommendations for clear signage and rules to promote cleanliness and responsible disposal.

The topic of fundraising for the dog park was explored, focusing on acquiring fencing and other essentials first. Ideas for community engagement included selling engraved bricks as part of the park’s entrance and seeking corporate sponsorships, though some members expressed reservations about permanent advertising on city property. The council also considered grant opportunities, including potential partnerships with local organizations like PetSmart, despite concerns about naming stipulations tied to such grants.

Naming the dog park sparked interest, with suggestions for a community contest to reflect the local spirit. Infrastructure considerations included parking, lighting, and signage, with an emphasis on ensuring the entrance is well-lit and welcoming. The council recognized the importance of compiling their findings and recommendations for the next meeting to move the dog park proposal forward.

In addition to the dog park, the council discussed community beautification efforts, particularly the selection of plants for median areas in downtown. The focus was on native and Florida-friendly plants that could thrive in shaded areas. Specific suggestions included small shrubs like Sunshine Ligustrum and dwarf Yaupon Holly, as well as resilient plants like Beauty Berry and the Cast Iron Plant. Ornamental options such as Drift or Knockout Roses and flowering plants like Black-eyed Susan and Beach Sunflower were praised for their color and low-maintenance nature.

The conversation emphasized the importance of continuity in plant selection. Members discussed the need for a cohesive design that would enhance the city’s aesthetic while being practical and sustainable.

The council also explored fundraising opportunities for community projects, including a recurring grant for cemetery improvements and a T-Mobile grant aimed at community enhancements. The potential for community donations for benches, with plaques for donors, was proposed as a funding strategy. Discussions included the installation of a water fountain, with a preference for a smaller model to avoid shared drinking areas between pets and people.

Agility equipment for community parks was seen as an engaging addition, with potential grant opportunities for agility training mentioned. The council considered various types of durable and easy-to-maintain equipment, along with the possibility of corporate sponsorships to assist with funding and maintenance.