The meeting commenced with the formal presentation of a proclamation to Carol Rees, recognizing her extensive contributions as both a municipal employee and volunteer. Rees has been a crucial member of the Tri-Boro First Aid Squad and the Seaside Park Volunteer Fire Company Ladies Auxiliary, achieving life member status in both organizations. The proclamation celebrated her commitment, stating, “Carol Rees has faithfully served the borough of Seaside Park…she is an invaluable member of our community…has achieved life member status…and has earned…the respect and admiration of her peers.” The mayor presented the proclamation, conveying gratitude on behalf of the council and the community, and wished her continued success and happiness.

Following the tribute to Rees, the council addressed an initiative by the local softball league to relocate and add a plaque dedicated to Uncle Mo Laine, a historical figure in the community. Jeff Potter coordinated this effort, which would not incur any costs to the borough. The proposal includes placing a second plaque next to the original to honor all who have played at the Uncle M Bean field. The council expressed support for the initiative.

A significant portion of the meeting focused on flood mitigation efforts detailed in a letter from Chuck Applebee, chair of the Bayfront Advisory Committee. The letter summarized the outcomes of a public roundtable meeting, emphasizing the importance of securing joint funding for projects impacting county roads and seeking support from Ocean County. The mayor highlighted a shift in the county’s approach due to increased advocacy and pressure, stating, “I believe that they’re now looking at it further.”

The council discussed the need for improved communication and regular status updates on ongoing flood mitigation projects. A council member suggested that better dialogue and transparency would benefit all parties, allowing for greater awareness of project statuses.

Another major topic was a bond ordinance to secure funding for the reconstruction of 17 blocks of the boardwalk. The project, estimated to cost approximately $12.3 million, involves a loan from the New Jersey Infrastructure Bank (I Bank), with 50% of the loan at zero interest and the remaining 50% market-based. The council discussed the structure of the financing and the bond ordinance’s initial reading scheduled for September 19, with a final reading on October 3 after a public hearing. The council also addressed ongoing adjustments required to make infrastructure, such as handicap ramps, compliant with current standards.

In addition to these discussions, the council considered a proposal to update the security camera system across various borough facilities, including the borough hall, police department, and DPW garage. The current security equipment, being outdated and inadequate, necessitated this update. The council emphasized the urgency of improving security measures, noting that the DPW currently lacks security cameras.

The meeting also covered a proposal from the American Littoral Society regarding modifications to the shoreline mitigation plan. This proposal aims to focus on living shorelines rather than hardscapes, which the society typically does not support. Frustrations were expressed regarding the lack of specificity in requirements from the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers, which has stalled progress. The council agreed that any living shoreline project should incorporate wave attenuation measures to ensure its effectiveness.

During the public comments section, several attendees raised queries and concerns. A council candidate, Mike Spino, sought clarification on the concept of “living shoreline” and its components, such as oysters and seaweed. Spino also inquired about a $133,000 financial investment, seeking details on the deliverables associated with this expenditure. The council provided a breakdown of tasks including revising the sediment mitigation plan, coordinating with agencies for permits, project coordination, and organizing public meetings to keep the community informed.

Another resident suggested establishing a dedicated section on the borough’s website for updates on bay-related matters to ensure consistent public engagement. This was echoed by John Chuck, who supported the idea of public meetings to enhance community engagement, highlighting recent flooding events as a motivator for ongoing discussions about the bay’s condition.