During the public comment segment, resident John Pulos expressed strong opposition to the proposed changes to Ordinance 2791, arguing that the revisions would weaken the existing measures for maintaining community peace. Pulos emphasized the importance of the ordinance, stating, “We deserve the right to enjoy our homes and property in peace,” and criticized the lack of police response to noise complaints. He recounted instances where police dismissed his concerns about loud music from neighbors’ parties. Pulos argued that the proposed reliance on police discretion without proper training or sound measurement equipment would allow officers to disregard legitimate complaints.

Council members engaged in a discussion regarding Pulos’s concerns. One council member assured that training and equipment procurement were planned to address the shortcomings in police response. They highlighted that the revised ordinance aimed to clarify existing ambiguities and improve enforcement, stating, “The purpose of this ordinance is to clean up predated language that no longer serves the community effectively.”

The council then introduced Ordinance 2789, concerning handicap parking on streets for private residences, scheduled for a second reading and public hearing on October 3, 2024. This was followed by the introduction of Ordinance 2790, which fixed the salaries of police officers, aligning with a previously ratified contract.

Further, the introduction of Ordinance 2791 sparked questions regarding the specifics of noise level measurements. A council member inquired about the decibel levels referenced and how the ordinance would be implemented in practice. It was clarified that the proposed noise levels would align with the New Jersey Noise Control Act, and training for officers was planned. The council member emphasized the importance of having trained officers on each shift to avoid enforcement gaps.

Some council members debated the necessity of a clause allowing police officers to use discretion if sound measurement devices were unavailable, considering scenarios where equipment might fail. The consensus leaned toward retaining this clause as a safeguard to ensure officers could still respond appropriately in such situations.

In discussing law enforcement training and equipment needs, the council addressed potential gaps in enforcement due to officer availability and the cost of necessary devices for enforcement, which ranged from approximately $1,000 to $15,000. The purchase is expected in 2025, emphasizing the need for an interim enforcement mechanism.

A significant portion of the meeting revolved around Ordinance 2792, amending ordinance 2781 to fix salary ranges for non-union employees and officials. The council discussed changes regarding Special Law Enforcement Officers, specifically classes two and three, which relate to public safety measures in schools. Collaboration with the school district is ongoing to enhance safety protocols, including a potential expansion into elementary schools by 2025. The council is formalizing agreements to ensure the school district compensates the borough for the officer presence.

The consent agenda included routine resolutions, such as the appointment of Alexis L. Rotman as a high school counselor and the acceptance of resignations from multiple counselors. A notable resolution involved the ratification of a purchase for a shade structure from Ben Shaer Recreation at a cost not to exceed $7,754. The shade structure, described as a hexagonal steel design with provisions for electrical receptacles and internal lighting, sparked discussion. It was clarified that the structure is not intended to function as a gazebo, as it does not have sides, but provides shaded space.

Resolution 23524, awarding a contract for improvements to Boy Scout Park, drew attention. The project includes a shade structure, concrete work, and the installation of a new flagpole with uplighting, requiring running electrical service to the park. Concerns were raised about the overall cost, with one member expressing that $70,000 seemed excessive. The council was informed that the project cost is partially mitigated by a $65,000 matching grant from the county.

The council also shared condolences for community members who passed away, including a notable history teacher from Roselle Park High School. Council members recounted their attendance at events such as the Hispanic Festival and the 9/11 memorial, reflecting on the significance of these gatherings.

Community events were promoted, including the annual Arts Festival on September 28, the Annual Festival of India on October 5, and the first annual Italian Heritage Festival on October 19, which will feature a cannoli-eating contest. One council member encouraged community engagement, stating, “We really want to see you out,” emphasizing the importance of enjoying local events.

Public comments included concerns from resident Edward Selia regarding the removal of his handicap parking spot. Selia detailed his wife’s wheelchair dependency and expressed frustration over the inconsistency in enforcement and perceived neglect from local authorities. Another resident, Bill Cross, complimented a council member for providing information about tree permits and raised concerns over the accuracy of information communicated to the public, particularly regarding noise control and vehicle regulations.