The most discussion centered around the proposal by Conserva Irrigation to convert a building on Old Bridge-Matawan Road into an office and storage space. The property, previously a gas station and later a dry cleaner, required both preliminary and final site plan approval, along with a D1 use variance and several C variances. The applicant’s representative, Lawrence Sachs, detailed the site’s history and outlined the intended use as an irrigation company specializing in the installation and servicing of lawn irrigation systems.

Chris Veneri, the principal of Conserva Irrigation, provided testimony about the business operations, including details about the office space, which measures approximately 1,850 square feet. He explained that the company employs a crew of six service technicians and three office personnel. The operational hours were stated to be from 7:30 AM to 5:00 PM on weekdays, with limited activity on Saturdays during peak seasons. Veneri noted that parking would accommodate the vehicles of the crew and office staff, with 18 available spaces. Importantly, vehicle maintenance would be conducted off-site, minimizing disruptions.

Concerns about the property’s historical use as a gas station were raised, particularly regarding environmental issues. The presence of monitoring wells from its gas station days was noted, but it was clarified that the site had undergone some remedial work. This history informed the board’s cautious approach to approving the new use. The board sought clarification on potential environmental risks, with further groundwater sampling suggested to ensure no contamination remained.

The application included plans to convert paved areas back to green space and consolidate access points to one full movement driveway on Morganville Road. Additionally, the county’s recommendations were incorporated, such as prohibiting left turns both in and out of the driveway on Route 516, extending a sidewalk to a nearby bus stop, and installing stop signs and bars at both driveways.

A resident from Morganville Road voiced concerns about the visibility of outdoor equipment and the height of a proposed fence, which she feared might obstruct sightlines when exiting her property. To address these concerns, the applicant assured that some equipment, like compressors, would be stored inside a box trailer, thus not visible from outside. The board discussed the necessity and height of the fence, considering adjustments to avoid blocking the resident’s view.

The board also examined the implications of the proposed use, concluding that it would be low-intensity and less intrusive than other potential commercial uses, such as a convenience store. The application was ultimately approved, with commitments to provide a lighting plan that complies with township ordinances and addresses community concerns.

In another significant case, the board reviewed an application for a large home addition on Jasmine Road, presented by Michael and Julian Pacer. The proposed addition, intended to accommodate elderly family members, required variances for side yard setbacks. The architect, Jason Peist, detailed the design, which included extending the existing structure to maintain a usable backyard space. The board approved the application, acknowledging the necessity and thoughtful planning behind the addition.

The meeting also addressed several residential variance applications, including those for fences and gazebos. One notable case involved Chandra Pon, who sought approval for a six-foot vinyl fence and a gazebo in his front yard. The board discussed the unique layout of Pon’s property and clarified the zoning requirements. Pon agreed to comply with the conditions set by the board, including obtaining a letter of no interest or approval from the Homeowners Association (HOA) and adhering to setback requirements.

Additionally, the board considered Carol Baker’s application for renovations to a single-family home on Amboy Road. The proposal included adding a habitable second floor and constructing front and rear covered porches. The board deliberated on the variances required due to changes in the floor area ratio and setbacks. The application was approved, with the board acknowledging the need for safety and suitability for the homeowner’s family.