The meeting’s primary emphasis was on the proposed cemetery’s impact on groundwater and stormwater management. A civil engineer provided a analysis of the site’s topography and hydrology, explaining that the groundwater and surface water would flow towards the marsh bog brook wetlands. The engineer assured the board that the elevation differences between the cemetery site and surrounding homes would prevent runoff from affecting nearby residences.

However, concerns were raised by an opposing attorney representing several objectors. The attorney questioned the adequacy of the proposed stormwater management plans and the potential contamination of groundwater from decomposing bodies. The board allowed the applicant to present further evidence, including governmental records related to nearby wells and septic systems.

The discussion then turned to the environmental regulations and historical practices concerning cemeteries. An expert in toxicology and environmental engineering, Dr. Dennis Stankin, was introduced to provide insights into the decomposition process and its effects on soil and groundwater. Dr. Stankin explained that the decomposition of human bodies involves the release of fluids and gases, which can influence soil composition and microbial activity. He emphasized that while there is a potential for decomposed bodies to enrich soil, the process is gradual and involves both aerobic and anaerobic bacteria.

Further inquiries from the board members delved into the specifics of groundwater flow and the potential contamination from decomposing bodies. Dr. Stankin discussed the role of microbial mats in the decomposition process and how they interact with the soil. He also addressed concerns about the movement of bacteria and viruses from decomposing bodies into groundwater, noting that many studies have flawed experimental designs that do not accurately reflect the conditions at the proposed site.

The board also examined the implications of seasonal high water tables and soil permeability. Test pits were conducted to assess the site’s conditions, with some pits revealing a high water table at 48 inches. The board discussed the need for additional testing to correlate with the existing grade and ensure the accuracy of the stormwater management plans.

In addition to the technical discussions, the board considered the historical context of cemetery operations and the regulatory landscape. It was noted that while the New Jersey Department of Environmental Protection (DEP) has not typically raised environmental issues with cemeteries, the board expressed a need for thorough assessments to address public concerns.

Public comments further highlighted the community’s apprehensions. Residents questioned the potential contamination of groundwater from the cemetery and the adequacy of monitoring wells to detect any issues. The board acknowledged the need for ongoing monitoring and the importance of maintaining transparency in the process.

The board agreed to carry the case to the next meeting on December 9th to allow for further discussions and to address unresolved questions. The meeting concluded with a procedural motion to keep public comments open.