Brad Chase from the Massachusetts Division of Marine Fisheries presented a detailed stream maintenance plan for Stump Brook. The plan targets the removal of debris, fallen trees, and excessive vegetation to facilitate the upstream migration of fish, particularly river herring, to their spawning habitats. Chase emphasized the importance of collaboration with local volunteers and the Alewife Restoration Committee, stating that the cleanup would focus on areas between Elm Street and the Stump Brook Dam. The initiative aims to ensure that fish can migrate upstream without hindrances, thereby supporting local wildlife and enhancing environmental health.

Chase elaborated on the logistical challenges posed by the project, particularly the need for access to privately-owned lands adjacent to Stump Brook. He assured the commission that any necessary access would be negotiated with property owners, emphasizing respect for their rights. The work will primarily involve manual labor with minimal equipment to preserve the riverbank and canopy.

The commission discussed the regulatory framework governing the cleanup, noting that while the project falls under the Wetlands Protection Act, it qualifies as minor activity essential for protecting migratory fish resources. This classification negates the need for a formal permit application. A motion to support the Stump Brook cleanup project, contingent on including reporting requirements for transparency, was seconded and unanimously approved through a roll call vote. Chase confirmed that a finalized stream maintenance plan, including reporting aspects, would be shared with the commission, and the bulk of the work would occur between mid-October and mid-December.

In another significant agenda item, the commission discussed a variance request for work within the 50-foot wetland buffer zone on Palma Mill Road. Following the closure of the public hearing, the commission deliberated on a bond to ensure proper restoration of the disturbed area. The initial bond amount suggested was $110,000, but after discussion, a motion to approve the variance request with a bond set at $5,000 was made and passed unanimously.

Attention then shifted to stormwater management issues at 265 and Ponson Street. The applicant for a property on Ponson Street requested and received a continuance until October 8 through a unanimous roll call vote. For 266 Ponson Street, the commission decided to work on stormwater findings without continuing the hearing, emphasizing the need for a good template for stormwater management.

The commission also approved a variance request and waiver for a property on River Street, allowing work within the riverfront area. The project representatives discussed the order of conditions and confirmed that necessary funds were en route to the appropriate office. This decision was also unanimously approved.

During the meeting, the commission addressed an ongoing issue at Lot 11 Pill Road, where unauthorized site clearing had occurred. Despite multiple communications, the property owner had not engaged with the commission. The board expressed frustration over the lack of response and debated whether to proceed under Section 21D or consult town counsel. A motion to seek guidance from town counsel was put forth and approved through a roll call vote.

The meeting included a discussion on the Community Preservation Act (CPA) funding. A representative from the ballot committee explained that the act allows towns to raise and receive state funds for community preservation efforts. The upcoming ballot proposal would involve a 1.5% property tax assessment, estimated to cost the average homeowner $88 annually. The funds would be allocated with 10% directed toward historical preservation, open space, and housing, while the remaining 70% could be used across these categories as needed. The board expressed mixed reactions, but ultimately voted to support the CPA initiative.

Additional agenda items included an amended certificate of compliance for 810th Avenue to correct a reference number error, which was promptly approved. The commission also discussed low water levels in Silver Lake, attributed to the City of Brockton, which affects local marine life, particularly river herring. The commission decided to share this information with the Board of Selectmen.

Finally, the commission emphasized the importance of training for board members, proposing the acquisition of updated Wetlands Protection Act regulation manuals. A motion to adjourn was unanimously supported.