The committee emphasized the need for increased membership, expressing concerns over the current small size of the group. One member highlighted the difficulty of maintaining a quorum and suggested that the committee could benefit from initiatives similar to those in Newport, where a fair was hosted to encourage volunteerism. The idea of drafting press releases to publicize the committee’s activities and attract new members was also proposed. “If we have something to say, the Daily News would run something,” a member suggested, underlining the importance of visibility.

The committee discussed the possible election of officers, debating between electing a permanent chair and appointing a temporary chair to lead until more members are recruited. The importance of having a structured leadership was recognized, but the immediate focus was on expanding the committee to ensure effective collaboration and continuity in meetings.

Efforts to recruit new members included reaching out to local organizations with shared interests in open space issues. A member mentioned the Parker River Clean Water Association, noting its dwindling membership and the necessity of revitalizing such groups. Additionally, the involvement of local schools and PTAs was discussed, with a member suggesting that connecting with families and youth could bring fresh perspectives to the committee’s efforts.

A critical part of the meeting was the discussion on creating a comprehensive map of public access properties in Newbury. The committee reviewed the existing map, noting that some open spaces, like the upper and lower greens, were not represented. This led to a debate about the criteria for including properties on the map and how to differentiate between accessible and non-accessible areas. The committee acknowledged the importance of transparency in access rights, with one member expressing curiosity about other open spaces not currently included on the map.

The conversation also touched on the complexities of public access to Plum Island. Concerns were raised about the lack of clarity in the numbering system for access points and the negative messaging of existing signage, which emphasized restrictions rather than public use. The need for better advocacy and policy development regarding public spaces was emphasized, with suggestions to explore policies from other towns that could be applicable to Newbury.

The committee discussed the implications of Chapter 61A and Chapter 61B properties, which have specific regulations regarding access and usage. There was frustration over the town’s delay in inspecting these properties and a call for more transparency about their status. The significance of developing a formal policy around Chapter 61 transactions was highlighted, as Newbury currently lacks such a framework.

A recent case involving a property on Central Street, classified under Chapter 61A and currently being sold, was mentioned. The town has the right of first refusal to purchase such properties, presenting an opportunity for preserving open space. The committee recognized the need for a proactive role in the review process when properties change hands.

The committee also deliberated on enhancing their website to engage the community better. Improvements included a cleaner layout and simplified dropdowns, and the introduction of a changing photo gallery featuring local properties. This gallery was seen as an opportunity to reflect Newbury’s landscapes and promote community engagement.

Members brainstormed ways to increase visibility for the committee and its activities.