The meeting also addressed the city’s ongoing partnership with the local school district concerning water main upgrades. The council discussed a cost-sharing arrangement for replacing aging ductile iron pipes with modern C900 pipes. The project, which has been in discussion due to a series of water main breaks over the past decade, involves upgrading a six-inch line to a twelve-inch diameter, crucial for accommodating future needs. The council debated the financial implications of the upgrades, estimated at $300,000, and how the city and school district would share the costs. There was consensus on the need for a clear delineation of responsibilities to ensure a fair and sustainable agreement.

Simultaneously, the council examined potential adjustments to utility rates and fees, prompted by the necessity of funding significant water infrastructure projects. An upcoming $15 million water treatment plant project requires a substantial 133% increase in utility rates and connection charges, addressing both current debt and future financial demands. The council acknowledged the impact on residents, with projected increases to average water bills for varying usage levels. While necessary, these adjustments were considered within the broader context of long-term financial sustainability and the essential nature of the improvements.

Attention was also given to the Gillespie Center, where a new director presented a strategic plan aimed at overcoming its financial deficit and declining membership. The director outlined a vision for transforming the center from a senior-focused facility to a community hub inclusive of all ages, reflecting demographic shifts and contemporary lifestyle needs. This transformation involves a refreshed mission, emphasizing sustainability and innovation, with goals to enhance financial health and community engagement. Fundraising initiatives, such as partnerships with local organizations and events like “Turkey Bingo” and “Breakfast with Santa,” were highlighted as part of efforts to increase financial support and community involvement.

The council also considered a resident’s request regarding drainage issues on private property, a topic that sparked broader discussion about municipal responsibilities versus homeowner obligations. The feasibility of city intervention was debated, with suggestions for a study to assess the situation if the resident agreed to fund it. The council expressed caution about setting precedents and emphasized the need for clear ownership and responsibility before proceeding.

Lastly, the council examined cybersecurity measures, contemplating the implementation of a Managed Detection and Response (MDR) tool to protect city networks from cyber threats. Recognizing the growing importance of cybersecurity, the council planned to revisit the topic with additional information on costs and implementation strategies.