A primary topic of concern was the proposal to expand the building, which many council members feared would obstruct the views of the beach and ocean for local residents. One council member highlighted the necessity of preserving these views, saying, “I don’t think we should be expanding that building.” The council underscored the need to engage the public to better understand their needs and desires for the building’s future use. Suggestions were made to organize a public meeting to gather input, focusing on essential services like public bathrooms and concessions rather than luxury offerings.

Financial implications of the project were another major concern, as current costs associated with the grant application were already exceeding the grant amount.

Public comments during the meeting echoed the council’s concerns, with residents emphasizing the need for basic facilities such as restrooms near the playground. One resident declared, “we do not want a museum,” stressing the necessity of amenities for families and children. This feedback underscored a disconnect between the council’s initial proposals and the practical needs of the community. Residents called for improved communication and proactive outreach efforts to ensure broader public input.

In addition to the Ocean Avenue project, the meeting addressed the need for improved bathroom facilities in the borough, which would be funded by The Beach utility without using taxpayer money. Participants expressed dissatisfaction with the current temporary restroom facilities, with one individual stating that the existing setup does not meet the town’s standards. The conversation highlighted the need for more elaborate bathrooms, particularly due to long lines at the women’s restroom.

The council also discussed several grants and their implications for Bradley Beach. A $2.4 million grant for Sil Lake improvements was noted, aimed at rehabilitating a failing bulkhead. Public presentations are planned to incorporate community input. There was also talk of a $4.275 million grant designated for extending the promenade from Third Avenue to the municipal boardwalk, with completion required by the end of 2026. The urgency of this project was emphasized as it aims to protect the southern part of the town from storm impacts.

Frustrations were voiced over the lack of available information and public access to proposals, leading to calls for the council to improve transparency. Public comments revealed a desire for the council to delay decisions until sufficient information could be made available to residents.

Other discussions included the management of multiple municipal projects, the need for comprehensive environmental studies, and concerns about financial management. The council addressed the importance of ensuring projects meet community needs while maintaining regulatory compliance. Financial considerations were a recurring theme, with questions raised about the rationale behind hiring outside engineering services and the need for thorough oversight.