A primary concern addressed during the meeting was the confusion surrounding discrepancies in software maintenance expenses within the budget received as of October 4th. Members expressed uncertainty over the amounts requested compared to what appeared in the budget.

Property assessments also featured prominently in the meeting, with attention drawn to specific properties and their valuations. A notable discussion revolved around 403 Birch Street, where members expressed skepticism about the property’s condition and valuation. Despite cosmetic improvements, the property’s value was judged to be approximately $260,000, and members agreed that an increased assessment would not be justifiable.

Further property-related discussions included 250 State Street, where a portion of the garage was rented to a for-profit organization. The board recognized the need to clarify the rental arrangement, as existing records only detailed the right-hand end of the garage being rented. This raised questions about the accuracy of property records and the importance of keeping comprehensive documentation.

Another topic of interest was the issue with 309 East State Street, where a greenhouse was reportedly missing from the property card. Members debated its status, questioning the absence of documentation and whether it had been constructed recently. This highlighted the complexities involved in property classification and the need for accurate representation in terms of square footage and valuation.

The meeting also touched on logistical matters, including the proposal to move the next board meeting to 5:30 PM on October 21st to accommodate a town meeting scheduled for 7 PM. This adjustment aimed to ensure a smooth transition between meetings, reflecting members’ ongoing efforts to manage their schedules effectively.

Additionally, the board reviewed requests for abutter lists, particularly from an individual named Raymond Moret, who sought this information for unspecified purposes. The board also examined the building inspector’s report, which revealed missing certificates of occupancy for several new homes in Granby. The inspector sought assistance from the board to ensure record accuracy, emphasizing the significance of maintaining up-to-date documentation.

Attention was also given to veterans’ exemptions, specifically Clause 22A, with 24 exemptions noted. The process required 37 signatures on the paperwork.