The potential defeat of the Ignite Student Learning referendum, scheduled for November 5, 2024, dominated the meeting. The board discussed a resolution directing the superintendent to prepare a budget for the 2025-2026 academic year that includes substantial reductions if the referendum does not pass. This plan involves closing three elementary schools, which would reduce student spaces by about 10%, increase class sizes across all grades by three students, and cut central office and non-instructional positions, along with programs tied to the Ignite initiative.

The proposed closures could save the district over $2.3 million, while increasing class sizes could result in savings of approximately $5.6 million through the elimination of around 50 full-time teaching positions. Reducing central office and non-instructional roles would save over $2.3 million, affecting about 20 full-time positions. Additionally, cutting programs linked to the Ignite proposal could save more than $6.3 million. Criteria for school closures would consider current excess capacity, geographic location relative to student residences, the condition of the schools, and the presence of special facilities.

Board members debated the need for transparency in identifying which schools might be affected, with some advocating for clarity to mobilize community support. Others emphasized the broader health of the district, stressing the referendum’s importance in maintaining quality education for all students.

Class size emerged as a crucial concern, with members noting its direct impact on educational outcomes and the district’s attractiveness. Concerns were raised about the potential loss of specialized roles such as reading and curriculum media specialists, which are vital for quality education and inclusivity.

The meeting also highlighted the district’s successful energy efficiency program, which has saved $5.31 million over six years. Despite rising utility costs, the district managed to reduce its cost per square foot by 30%, avoiding over $1 million in additional utility payments. The environmental impact was significant, with an estimated reduction of 217 million KBTUs, equivalent to avoiding 25,000 metric tons of CO2 emissions. The district has been proactive in securing grants for solar panel installations, with recent projects at several schools and plans for more.

The board reviewed the controversial cell phone ban in schools, focusing on student reactions. Initially met with disbelief and frustration, students reported increased engagement and social interaction after a month. Some students missed the convenience of phones, but others appreciated the new connections made without digital distractions. Superintendent Kent Pel acknowledged the policy’s impact on student engagement and praised their willingness to share experiences.