The consulting agency highlighted the district’s commendable performance above the state average in certain special education metrics despite high staff turnover. Nevertheless, concerns were raised about the classification rates and the over-reliance on paraprofessionals, which could hinder student independence. The audit stressed the importance of a “least restrictive environment,” emphasizing that while general education classes are typically preferred, they may not always be suitable if students depend excessively on paraprofessionals.

The audit identified deficiencies in documentation practices, particularly concerning the underutilization of the Frontline IEP program. This shortfall in record-keeping was noted as a contributing factor to poor performance during state monitoring and increased vulnerability to legal challenges. The consultant recommended implementing standardized operating procedures within the special education department to ensure continuity and compliance, regardless of administrative turnover.

Additionally, the audit stressed the need for better integration and retention strategies for special education staff. It was recommended that the district develop stronger policies to promote staff integration and prevent turnover, which could further destabilize the department. This suggestion was echoed by a public comment from a parent advocate who urged the board to prioritize trust-building and communication with parents, emphasizing the necessity of clear, actionable IEP goals for student success.

During the meeting, the board also addressed the role of paraprofessionals in supporting students with special needs. Concerns were raised about the continuous reliance on paraprofessionals, with suggestions to gradually phase out their involvement to encourage greater student independence. The discussion further explored the need for professional development for the Child Study Team and general education teachers to better support special education students.

In addition to the special education audit, the board received updates on the Student Safety Data System (SSDS), which reports incidents such as violence, vandalism, and substance abuse. To tackle these issues, the district has initiated several programs, including the implementation of a new power school system for tracking incidents and preventive education lessons for students on harassment, intimidation, and bullying.

Substance abuse, particularly marijuana use, was highlighted as a prevalent issue among students. The board discussed the Yonder program, a parent-option initiative aimed at addressing this concern. Questions were raised about the program’s effectiveness and the need for supplemental teacher training on de-escalation techniques.

The meeting also covered updates on various district facilities, with reports of ongoing construction and renovation projects across schools. Key developments included the installation of new HVAC systems and the resolution of steam leaks.

In governance matters, the board deliberated on operational transparency, specifically regarding the synchronization of board secretary and treasurer reports to enhance clarity. A proposal to reinstate a reimagined guidance position focused on student well-being and mental health was also discussed, with funding secured through a successful lobbying effort.

The superintendent highlighted the importance of stakeholder input in achieving these goals.