The public input segment of the meeting was charged with emotion as residents expressed their views on Williams’ removal. Supporters of the city manager, such as Daniel Whitebook, a long-time business owner in Opa-Locka, praised Williams for his professionalism and dedication. Whitebook remarked, “I’ve never met anybody that was more professional that worked as hard that cared more about the citizens of Opa-Locka,” underscoring Williams’ positive impact on local businesses and residents.

In contrast, other community members voiced skepticism about Williams’ ability to effectively lead the city. George Suarez questioned his leadership, stating that the city is at a “critical juncture” and argued that Williams “can’t handle that.” Suarez’s remarks encapsulated the concerns of those who believe the city needs new leadership to address ongoing challenges.

Following the vote to terminate Williams, the commission swiftly moved to appoint Shamea Lawson as the interim city manager. While the commission agreed on Lawson’s immediate appointment, they also acknowledged the need to develop a comprehensive strategy for the city’s future leadership within a 90-day period.

The meeting’s public input segment also revealed broader concerns about governance and city management. Residents like Roslin Kelly criticized the commission’s leadership, alleging that personal vendettas were hindering Opa-Locka’s progress. Kelly asserted that elected officials should prioritize the community’s needs over personal agendas, pointing to a “terrible record of corruption.”

Environmental issues were another point of contention, with resident Mark Cooper highlighting pollution problems following his recent arrest in an affected area. Cooper urged the commission to focus on resolving these issues rather than engaging in internal conflicts, acknowledging the challenges faced by the city manager and calling for collaboration among commission members.

Peterson questioned the motives behind the meeting, asking, “why we here tonight besides trying to get rid of him,” and expressed a desire to contribute positively through a role in code enforcement.

The community appeared deeply divided over the city’s direction, with some advocating for the retention of the current city manager to maintain continuity, while others called for a change in leadership to address the city’s challenges more effectively.