Among the most prominent topics was the proposal to permit duplexes in rural living zones, a suggestion met with diverse perspectives due to its potential impact on the community’s character and infrastructure. This proposal stemmed from numerous community inquiries following the introduction of a new zoning code. While some participants acknowledged that allowing duplexes could increase population density in traditionally single-family home areas, they also noted that many of these areas already had the necessary infrastructure, such as sewer systems, to support such development. Conversely, concerns were voiced over the existing infrastructure’s capacity to handle increased density and the potential alteration of the area’s residential character.

The commission recognized the distinction between rural living one (RL1) and rural living two (RL2) districts, noting that RL2 is less likely to receive urban services, making it potentially more suitable for duplexes. A proposal was made to allow duplexes in RL2 with a review scheduled in two years to evaluate the impact of this change. This approach aims to balance housing needs with preserving the community’s character.

Simultaneously, the commission tackled the topic of building design standards, specifically the number of design elements required for two-story structures. While some commissioners argued that additional design elements could enhance visual appeal and prevent monotonous architecture, others stressed the need for flexibility and creativity. Ultimately, the discussion concluded with a motion to require two design elements for standard structures and three for two-story buildings.

In addition to these discussions, the commission explored the potential rezoning of certain properties from rural living one to rural living two, due to a lack of services that rendered these areas not particularly developable in the near future. This motion was unanimously approved.

The meeting also addressed the city’s current mandate requiring off-street parking to be paved with asphalt or concrete within the general industrial zoning district. This requirement has posed challenges for businesses needing to expand or modify existing structures. The commission considered potential code changes to allow alternatives to asphalt or concrete, particularly for minor expansions or low-traffic zones. Environmental concerns, such as heat retention from large paved areas and dust generation on windy days, were discussed, with suggestions to use chloride treatments on gravel surfaces and increase vegetation to mitigate wind and enhance stormwater management.

Finally, James provided updates on various city initiatives, including the preparation of a comprehensive cryptocurrency ordinance and efforts to advance Brainerd’s standing in the GreenStep Cities program. Concerns about the local housing shortage were also raised, with a call for caution in implementing design standards that could impact affordable housing.