Residents questioned the efficacy and necessity of the bypass, with some suggesting it was designed to benefit Rowan University by enhancing roadway connectivity. Borough representatives refuted this, stating the project was focused on addressing community traffic issues rather than university interests. However, the dissatisfaction with how the project was communicated persisted, with residents calling for improved transparency and more inclusive dialogue.

Concerns over the bypass were not the only issues discussed. Residents also voiced their dissatisfaction with the recently implemented paid parking system. One resident criticized the need to pay for parking while conducting civic duties like paying taxes, questioning the process by which the parking policy was implemented without a direct vote from the public. A council member acknowledged some concerns about the parking system. Despite these explanations, residents insisted that if the system was not effective, it should be reconsidered.

Traffic safety, particularly involving students, was another notable topic during the meeting. A resident highlighted the dangers posed by students crossing roads unsafely, especially near Ridge and Route 322. This concern was compounded by projections of significant growth in Rowan University’s student population, expected to nearly double by 2033.

Parking issues extended to questions about off-campus housing restrictions for students. Residents expressed frustrations over state laws that limit local control over where landlords can operate, complicating efforts to manage student housing and its impact on the community. The borough acknowledged these difficulties, emphasizing the need for ongoing efforts to coexist with the growing student population.

The meeting also addressed broader concerns about public communication. Residents stressed the need for better publicizing of meetings and updates on significant projects. The suggestion was made to utilize physical mailings to ensure all residents receive important information, as reliance on social media was not sufficient. There was consensus on the need for more effective communication channels to keep residents informed and involved.

The public comment period concluded with a reminder of the importance of respectful dialogue in addressing community issues. The meeting ended with procedural matters, including the approval of bills and a reminder of the next meeting date.