The focal point of the meeting was the extensive modifications planned for the Springfield Avenue property, intended to create a safer and more usable play area for children. The proposal included constructing retaining walls to manage a significant elevation change, along with a plan to remove 14 trees. Concerns were voiced by residents about the visual and environmental impact of these changes, particularly the construction of a 10-foot retaining wall that would replace the natural landscape.

Residents, such as Robert Spanheimer, expressed apprehension about the character of the neighborhood being altered with the removal of trees and the addition of large retaining walls. Residents cited past experiences with drainage issues exacerbated by neighboring properties and expressed skepticism about assurances that the project would not worsen these problems. One resident voiced their attachment to the existing trees and the natural landscape, fearing that the new construction would lead to a permanent change in the neighborhood’s character.

Tom Graham, a professional engineer for the applicants, presented details about the property and the necessity of the changes due to its topography, emphasizing the intention to make the yard more usable. He assured the board that the project would comply with local regulations and addressed the need for stormwater management, proposing measures to mitigate increased impervious coverage.

The board members engaged in vigorous discussion about the potential drainage implications and the aesthetic impact of the project. Some members were apprehensive about setting a precedent through the approval of such extensive modifications, emphasizing the importance of maintaining the natural landscape. One board member noted the project’s scale and argued for a more detailed stormwater management plan to ensure that drainage issues would not be exacerbated. They suggested additional measures, such as installing curbs and dry wells, to manage runoff effectively.

The approval was contingent on the submission of a landscaping plan and a stormwater management plan, with the board retaining jurisdiction over drainage for two years post-construction.

Another item on the agenda was the proposal related to the modification of a home on Walren Avenue. The project involved adding dormers and expanding the rear of the house to improve kitchen and mudroom space. The discussion focused on the dormers’ aesthetic implications and their potential to impact neighborhood character. The project required variances for building and lot coverage due to the proposed additions, and while some board members raised concerns about the scale of the dormers, the architect defended their necessity for enhancing the home’s curb appeal and functionality.

Additionally, the board reviewed a proposal for improvements to a property on Edgewood Road. The application, which sought variances for modifications to the existing garage and driveway, sparked debate over the size of the proposed garage door and the project’s impact on historic architectural features. The board emphasized the importance of ensuring safety and structural integrity while maintaining the aesthetic character of the property.