A paramount concern was the financial planning for a new Department of Public Works facility. The urgency of expediting decisions related to this facility was underscored, as it impacts other critical projects within the town. The board engaged in a detailed examination of budget estimates, exploring what could be achieved within financial constraints ranging from $12 million to $22 million. This exploration included leveraging previous analyses and engaging in technical geotechnical explorations to inform decision-making. The potential of collocating the DPW with Public Safety on School Street was debated, acknowledging the logistical and zoning implications such a move would entail.

The broader financial implications of these projects were discussed in the context of the FY 26 capital budget. The board presented a strategic plan incorporating both a standard yearly capital budget and a long-term facility needs spreadsheet, with emphasis on bonding and financial planning aimed at minimizing taxpayer burden. Especially notable was the projected $20 million to $21 million expenditure needed to address PFAS contamination in drinking water, contingent upon potential grants and litigation outcomes. Additionally, the board reviewed plans for a new public safety building, given concerns about flooding affecting current facilities.

Public safety was another focal point, with discussions on the downtown area’s fire risks due to its density and the presence of hazardous materials. The absence of a significant fire department presence downtown was noted, alongside recent incidents that underscored the need for enhanced responsiveness. The board considered modular construction approaches for future expansions.

In the realm of community engagement and public safety, the fire department reported positive performance with new equipment, although challenges with older vehicles like Engine One were acknowledged. The board debated the potential rate increases on permits and fees, recognizing the need for adjustment due to rising costs.

The Select Board also addressed regulatory changes, particularly concerning short-term rentals and accessory dwelling units (ADUs). The board weighed the integration of ADU regulations within the zoning bylaw, considering the increased flexibility this could provide.

Additionally, the recruitment process for a new Town Administrator was a significant topic. The board deliberated on whether to engage a recruiting firm for $14,000, ultimately deciding to approve the contract. An operational audit was also approved, with the board opting for a comprehensive approach to incorporate private sector best practices into municipal operations.

The meeting concluded with discussions regarding the Ocean Street project and the unsuccessful grant application, emphasizing the need for clear enforcement of construction access requirements. The board also prepared to enter executive session to discuss litigation strategy.