The discussion began with a motion to approve Habor’s hiring, which some council members supported based on the city administrator’s recommendation. However, others challenged the process, noting it was the first time a department head had been hired without broader council involvement. These members expressed their need for more information on Habor’s qualifications and those of other candidates, calling for transparency to ensure informed decision-making. This division led to a procedural debate over whether the council could discuss the matter further before voting. A challenge was raised, resulting in a split roll call vote that upheld the motion to allow additional discussion.

Amidst this debate, an email from October 6 was cited, which inquired about the number of applicants and the qualifications of those interviewed for the role. Frustration was voiced over the lack of responses to previous inquiries about the candidates, prompting a call for public data on the applicants, including resumes and interview scores. The motion to obtain this information passed.

The council ultimately decided not to uphold the city administrator’s recommendation to hire Habor, opting instead for more examination of the hiring process. This decision represents a call for greater involvement and transparency in future high-profile hiring decisions.

In other business, the council addressed the issue of repairing or replacing an aging sanitary sewer pipe near the river, with costs estimated around $1.1 million. Council members unanimously supported immediate action, recognizing the environmental safety concerns posed by the pipe’s condition.

Additionally, the council explored the adoption of franchise fees as a funding model, which would involve public engagement through informational meetings and surveys to gather community feedback. Concerns from both residents and the business community were acknowledged, leading to a motion to continue exploring the option without opposition.

The council also tackled the topic of insurance coverage changes, specifically the inclusion of rapid flashing beacon signs. This decision followed an incident where the city bore repair costs for a damaged sign due to the driver being uninsured. The council voted in favor of adding these signs to the city’s insurance coverage, considering potential savings and risks.

A discussion on the Brainerd Lakes Regional Airport included addressing the responsibilities for HR services and associated costs. Clarification was sought regarding the historical context of HR operations, which only formally began in 2007. Staff were directed to provide requested data on HR expenditures related to the airport.

On the financial front, the council reviewed a proposal for the issuance and sale of General Obligation Bonds totaling $3,370,000 to fund public improvements in North Brainerd and water-related projects. The council was informed about the bond sale schedule and market conditions, with questions arising about its impact on the city’s levy and surplus funds.

The council also authorized a preliminary proposal submission for a small cities development grant. The grant requires no local match, leveraging various sources to strengthen the application.