A significant portion of the meeting centered on refining the definitions of hotels and motels to better reflect contemporary lodging practices. Concerns were raised about the outdated nature of existing definitions, which do not accommodate new models like Airbnb or establishments with minimal services. The proposed revisions aimed to delineate hotels as facilities offering transient lodging along with optional additional services, while motels were defined by the direct outside access of rooms. The board considered the potential impact these revised definitions could have on properties that do not conform to traditional categories, such as those that have transitioned into apartment-like complexes. The issue of “transient” lodging was emphasized, highlighting the need for clear regulatory language to distinguish between short-term lodging and residential use.

The board also tackled the nuances of measuring floor space and determining habitable areas within buildings. A discussion unfolded around the implications of including or excluding certain spaces, like attics, from habitable floor area calculations. Participants expressed differing views on whether attic spaces, particularly those finished with drywall and flooring, should be classified as living accommodations.

In line with the redefinition of lodging and building use, the board examined the classification of structures and accessory buildings. The need for precise definitions was apparent, especially in distinguishing between attached and detached garages and the permissible use of spaces above them. Discussions revealed a consensus that living accommodations above garages should be allowed if the garage is attached to the principal dwelling. However, detached garages with living spaces presented a gray area, prompting suggestions for clearer guidelines to prevent zoning disputes.

The meeting further addressed the regulation of outdoor seating for businesses, particularly in the S1 beach strand district. There was a debate over whether existing constraints should be loosened to allow businesses to expand seating onto public walkways. Concerns about maintaining fair and consistent regulations for all businesses were raised, with some arguing for the necessity of reviews by multiple agencies to ensure compliance with safety and zoning standards.

Parking requirements were another focal point, especially for businesses in densely populated areas lacking adequate space for off-street parking. The board contemplated removing parking mandates for certain establishments, given the impracticality of enforcement. However, this suggestion faced resistance from those advocating for a review of parking policies to ensure consistency across all zoning districts.