The speed bump issue was highlighted by Brent Salvadori, who expressed frustration over the lack of transparency in the data collection used to justify the installation of speed bumps in his neighborhood. Salvadori emphasized that the data might not accurately reflect the traffic conditions, particularly the influence of motorcycles and trailers on speed measurements. He criticized the commission for not exploring less intrusive options, such as flashing speed radar signs, before installing the speed bumps. Salvadori argued that these measures were unnecessary, as no accidents involving vehicles and pedestrians had been reported in the area.

Tom Adams joined the discussion, describing the speed bumps as “violent” and advocating for removable speed humps that could manage speeds without causing excessive slowing or vehicle damage. Another resident, Zack de Waller, stressed the commission’s responsibility to prioritize residents’ needs over city liabilities, urging adherence to ordinances and warning against interruptions during public commentary that could infringe on civil rights.

The commission acknowledged the residents’ concerns, with a commissioner expressing dissatisfaction that the installation of the speed bumps had not been formally voted on by the commission. The city staff noted that they were unprepared to discuss the issue in detail during the meeting. The procedural oversight was a focal point, with calls for transparency and accurate communication with constituents emphasized throughout the discussion.

In other business, the city manager provided an update on the city’s stormwater management efforts. The report included progress on Hazard Mitigation Grant Program projects and the extension of contracts related to generator installations. The city had made strides in ditch maintenance, with over 100,000 feet of ditches dug since fiscal year 2021, reducing reported structural flooding. However, persistent drainage issues in specific blocks were noted, with residents encouraged to report flooding incidents to aid in documentation and resolution.

The meeting also addressed a proposed development order amendment for Grease Pro Auto on East Highway 390. The adjustments included changes in site plans due to the removal of a previously proposed office building, which allowed for new ingress and egress routes from Highway 390 and Harvard Boulevard. This modification aimed to alleviate traffic congestion in the area. The commission expressed satisfaction that the original development order conditions were met, noting that the traffic impact would be mitigated by redirecting vehicles away from the congested Harvard Boulevard.

Community engagement was a recurring theme, with announcements about upcoming events such as “Art in the Park,” rescheduled to November 8th, and a Halloween event in Sheffield Park, anticipated to be well-attended. Additionally, the police department announced an educational presentation on the dangers of fentanyl, inviting community members to participate.

Early voting turnout was highlighted, and the meeting included a moment of remembrance for a longtime city employee. The commission also discussed routine city expenditures and addressed inquiries about the warrant list, providing clarification on ongoing projects and expenditures related to city infrastructure.