A major focus of the meeting was the approval of a lighting layout for JC’s Park. The board was presented with two options: a more conservative lighting plan or a more extensive one that included additional lights between the parking lot and the soccer field. The cost per light was estimated at $7,500, with the total expense to be covered by operating expenses rather than the initial project budget. Concerns about financial implications were raised, particularly due to the absence of lighting in the preliminary budget. However, the decision ultimately leaned towards the more comprehensive option to address safety concerns and deter vandalism, with members agreeing that it was better to complete the project now rather than defer decisions.

The board also tackled pressing drainage issues, specifically with a change order involving the removal of a catch basin at JC’s Park. Concerns were voiced about the potential for water runoff to damage trails and create hazards during winter. There was a call for further evaluation of the site’s grading and fill to prevent future complications and ensure user safety. A motion was made to approve the necessary amendments and change orders while seeking more information on the grading impacts, particularly on the pleasure rink.

Vandalism was another significant topic at the meeting, with incidents at the bandstand drawing particular attention. The board discussed the need for improved surveillance and community involvement to protect public assets. Ideas such as increased lighting, cameras, and a stronger presence of community service officers were considered as potential deterrents. The board emphasized fostering a culture of respect for community structures and suggested making the bandstand more accessible to reduce the allure of vandalizing a seemingly exclusive area.

In terms of budgetary challenges, the board expressed concerns over the limited resources available for new projects. There was an acknowledgment of the need for external funding sources to support initiatives like the proposed pickleball courts, estimated to cost $51,000. The board recognized the importance of community involvement and fundraising, drawing parallels to successful past campaigns like that of the skateboard community. Despite financial constraints, there was a consensus to explore all possible avenues to meet community recreational needs.

The discussion also touched on the importance of transparency in park fees and expenditures, with feedback from fall sports indicating a need for clearer communication. The board reviewed facility rental fees for 2025, noting the addition of pickleball and basketball courts and a vendor fee for food trucks. Concerns were raised about field rental rates, particularly for tournaments, with suggestions to consider more competitive pricing.

Community engagement was highlighted through discussions on upcoming events, with the board expressing support for accommodating logistical needs for a Halloween event to promote community spirit. The recent Great Pumpkin Festival was praised for its success, emphasizing the value of such events in fostering community ties.