The New Jersey Department of Environmental Protection’s new mandate requiring all municipalities to enforce a Community-Wide ordinance on tree removal and replacement was a central topic. This ordinance, which all seven towns represented by the commission have adopted, aims to manage stormwater runoff in response to climate change. Under the rule, any tree removed must be replaced with one of similar trunk diameter or multiple smaller trees. Although the ordinance represents progress, there were discussions about the potential for municipalities to improve upon the model provided. Its enforcement is crucial, as it is linked to the Municipal Separate Storm Sewer System (MS4) requirements, adding regulatory weight to its implementation.

Shoreline protection was another priority, with updates on property delineation and potential construction projects. The commission emphasized the importance of notifying local towns about legal requirements for construction near the shoreline. A suggestion was made to draft a letter reminding towns of their obligations to communicate with the commission regarding work within 50 feet of the shoreline. This communication is vital, given the commission’s open space grant application for shoreline improvements. There were concerns about a project in Allenhurst involving dock revamping and bridge construction, with cautionary advice that current work might be undone by future developments. The commission plans to send a letter addressing these construction activities, particularly with upcoming plans on November 12.

Ownership of the Flume area sparked discussions. Historical documents from August 1920 revealed an agreement between Ocean Township and Asbury Park regarding the Flume and gatehouse creation. While the state owns the lake, the surrounding property is owned by the towns, leading to questions about mechanical responsibilities and maintenance. This complexity was further highlighted by discrepancies found during land inspections, particularly concerning property lines and road repairs after storms. The commission acknowledged the need for further clarity on these ownership issues and aims to facilitate better communication with local authorities.

In terms of environmental initiatives, the commission celebrated the success of goose remediation efforts and discussed plans for a joint meeting. A forthcoming fall cleanup event on November 3 was also announced, with plans to lower the lake to aid cleanup efforts. Innovative methods like using fishing magnets to engage participants, especially children, were proposed to enhance community involvement. The commission emphasized the importance of communication and collaboration with local schools and organizations to maximize participation.

Additionally, the commission addressed the format of future meetings, debating whether to adopt a hybrid or entirely virtual setup. A hybrid format was preferred, allowing for travel flexibility while ensuring public attendance. Discussions also covered Zoom logistics, with recommendations to lock meetings at 7:05 PM to manage participant entry effectively.

The meeting concluded with a focus on improving public awareness regarding storm drains and debris disposal. The commission distributed information packets to new lakefront homeowners and considered a new pamphlet for non-lakefront residents. Engaging community groups, like the Boy Scouts, in projects to promote proper disposal practices was suggested to mitigate environmental impacts.