The primary topic of contention was the use of Teacher Salary Increase Allocation (TSIA) funds. A representative from the district highlighted a directive from the Florida Department of Education, emphasizing that salary growth allocation funds cannot be distributed without an approved and ratified plan. The teachers’ union argued that the district’s latest proposal did not adequately address the financial needs of its members, specifically criticizing the offer of minimal increases that they likened to “half a tank of gas.”

Representatives from the teachers’ union suggested two options for the use of the raise pool that they believe are both reasonable and necessary to address long-standing financial issues. These proposals involve reallocating funds to address insurance and supplement disparities compared to neighboring districts. The union representatives expressed a strong commitment to these proposals, arguing that they align better with fiscal responsibility and fairness.

Additionally, the union expressed frustration over what it perceives as the district’s reluctance to resolve these issues, citing that their proposals are consistent with practices in surrounding counties. They emphasized the importance of gradual improvements over the contract period, which spans from 2023 to 2026, to prevent falling behind other districts.

On the procedural front, a suggestion was made for potential bifurcation of the contract to address the TSIA funds separately from other contract items. However, this was met with resistance from the union, which cited concerns over unfair labor practices and emphasized the need for comprehensive negotiations.