Livingston Residents Voice Strong Opposition to 45 South Livingston Avenue Development

The Livingston Town Council meeting was dominated by public opposition to a proposed redevelopment project on South Livingston Avenue. The council reintroduced Ordinance 19-2023, which proposes the construction of a 210-unit residential building. Residents expressed concerns about the project’s height, density, and potential impact on local schools and traffic, urging the council to reconsider or reject the proposal.

0:00During the public comment period, residents voiced their apprehensions about the proposed development, which includes 210 luxury apartments and 32 affordable units in a structure originally proposed to reach 60 feet. Many residents emphasized the disconnect between the proposed height and the existing maximum allowable height of 28 feet for commercial spaces along Livingston Avenue. The council acknowledged revisions to the plan, including a reduction in units from 240 to 210 and adjustments to the building’s height at the rear of the site. Nonetheless, these changes did little to assuage public concern.

21:44A resident known as Diane Infonte highlighted the lack of pedestrian-friendly infrastructure near the development site, specifically at the intersection of Route 10 and Livingston Avenue, calling the conditions “very stressful” and “dangerous.” Other residents echoed her sentiment, questioning whether the developers had adequately addressed community safety and character in their plans.

0:00Concerns over the impact on local schools were a recurring theme. Multiple residents, including Jay Alman, questioned the development’s potential to exacerbate overcrowding, referencing past instances where students were placed in trailer classrooms due to capacity issues. Residents argued that the new apartments could lead to an increase in student populations, further straining already crowded schools.

The discussion also touched on past development projects that residents felt had failed to fulfill promises, casting doubt on the assurances provided for the current proposal. A letter from residents expressed frustration, stating, “none of the promises were realized absolutely none,” and urged the council to align the proposal with community standards.

In response to community feedback, a council member explained that the ordinance required reintroduction due to procedural steps involving public notice and hearings. Despite revisions intended to address some concerns, the council acknowledged the challenges in satisfying all parties involved and emphasized the need for a balanced approach to growth that respects Livingston’s established character.

1:35:47Aside from the debate over the redevelopment project, other issues came to light during the meeting. Concerns regarding a lawsuit involving Detective Kevin Melany and allegations of sexual harassment were raised, prompting residents to question the town’s response and the need for accountability. The council did not provide specific updates on this matter during the meeting.

Additionally, amidst reflections and seasonal greetings from council members, one member addressed concerns about their demeanor. The Deputy Mayor extended Thanksgiving wishes and reminded residents of local procedures, including leaf collection.

Note: This meeting summary was generated by AI, which can occasionally misspell names, misattribute actions, and state inaccuracies. This summary is intended to be a starting point and you should review the meeting record linked above before acting on anything you read. If we got something wrong, let us know. We’re working every day to improve our process in pursuit of universal local government transparency.

Receive debriefs about local meetings in your inbox weekly:

Trending meetings
across the country: