The meeting’s primary focus was the application for the Hden Residence on Adams Avenue, which sought a variance to increase the lot coverage from an existing 36.5% to 36.94%. The property, already non-conforming, required a variance for exceeding the standard maximum of 35%. During the discussion, the board debated the implications of the proposed increase and the need for a waiver regarding stormwater management provisions. A board member suggested that removing a small area of sidewalk could potentially eliminate the need for a variance, but the applicant expressed concerns about access and safety, particularly during adverse weather conditions.

The architectural plans included a front porch addition, which contributed to the variance request. The board scrutinized the coverage figures and the interpretation of recent ordinance changes allowing increased impervious coverage for certain amenities. After thorough discussion, the board unanimously approved the variance, allowing the project to proceed while ensuring compliance with stormwater management regulations.

Another topic was the application for an attached garage and driveway on Midland Avenue. This application, a continuation from a prior meeting, involved revisions to reduce both lot and building coverage. The applicant’s architect presented modifications, such as the introduction of permeable pavers and adjustments to the garage and driveway size, which aimed to better align with zoning regulations. The board focused on ensuring compliance with coverage and drainage requirements, highlighting concerns about existing drainage conditions and the proper permitting process for previous work on the property.

The discussion also covered the permit for a newly installed sidewalk. There was confusion over whether the permit covered both the sidewalk and a wooden walkway, which had been replaced with a paved surface. The board emphasized the importance of adhering to town protocols and sought clarity on the existing coverage figures and the implications for the overall project.

The meeting further reviewed an application concerning the installation of a sidewalk and associated structures. Board members examined the specifics of the architectural plans, including the coverage metrics and the accessory building’s setback from Willow Avenue. The applicant requested a variance to reduce the setback from the required 30 feet to 18 feet, which the board assessed as reasonable given the context.