Chase Bank’s proposal to install solar carports at its location on North Beverwick Road was a focal point of the meeting. The project requires a D1 use variance as solar energy installations are not currently permitted as accessory uses in the B5 and R4 zones. The bank’s representatives outlined the project’s goals, aligning with their broader sustainability objectives. The solar carports are designed to cover 14 parking spaces, providing approximately 63% of the branch’s annual energy needs. Due to the building’s age and design, roof-mounted solar panels were deemed unfeasible, prompting the consideration of carports over the parking lot.

The project’s civil engineer presented the technical aspects, emphasizing the minimal glare from the solar panels due to anti-reflective coatings. The zoning board members listened to arguments supporting the project, including its alignment with the township’s 2020 Master Plan that encourages solar energy use. The planner noted that the bank’s location and available space make it suitable for such installations, asserting that the variance for height, which would exceed the 15-foot limit, was necessary to accommodate emergency vehicles.

However, questions arose regarding the height variance and the potential impact on the existing bank structure, which ranges from 13 to 16 feet tall. Concerns about lighting were also discussed. The board addressed the need for tree trimming to facilitate panel installation, coordinated with the township forester. The proposal’s slight increase in impervious coverage from 69.5% to 70% was noted, remaining within acceptable limits.

The board also heard from a professional planner who confirmed the proposal’s alignment with local development policies. After thorough discussion, a resolution was framed to approve the application, granting the requested variances and affirming the project’s contribution to sustainable practices.

In contrast, the proposal for a mixed-use structure to replace a former adult daycare center encountered more hurdles. The plan involves constructing a two-story building with three commercial units on the ground floor and three residential apartments above. Discussions revealed challenges related to variances for the building’s height and setbacks. The architect detailed the design, which includes a 40-foot setback from Precip Road, requiring a variance from the 50-foot ordinance standard.

Board members raised several concerns, including the placement of HVAC condensers and tenant storage access. The building’s design was intended to transition from a commercial to a residential aesthetic, incorporating colonial architectural elements. However, the lack of specified outdoor amenities and the need for handicap access sparked debate about the project’s suitability for potential residents.

The board considered issues about the sidewalk and railing in front of the commercial space, with safety concerns prompting discussions about the necessity of a railing due to topographical changes. Additionally, questions about the building’s attractiveness to tenants and the absence of recreational spaces were raised, highlighting the need for further design considerations.

Ultimately, the board decided to adjourn the meeting to give the developers time to address these unresolved issues. A follow-up session was scheduled for March 5th, allowing for more thorough planning and responses to the board’s inquiries.