A resident brought attention to the meeting by recounting two dog incidents occurring on their property in September. They criticized the township for inadequate responses and detailed their efforts to uncover deficiencies in the handling of the situation. Despite the dog owner’s guilty plea for previous charges related to the same dogs, the resident felt no substantial action was taken until they pursued the matter through legal channels. A court hearing is scheduled for December 11.

The resident highlighted problems with the existing dog census and the coordination between local departments. They argued that the township’s animal control officer, police, and health departments should be more synchronized in their efforts. The resident went so far as to request an extension of the three-minute speaking limit during public comments, asserting that such restrictions hinder public discourse on issues.

Board members appeared concerned about the resident’s allegations. Some members admitted unfamiliarity with the specific incidents, while others acknowledged the seriousness of the concerns raised. They agreed on the necessity of addressing the matter, given the limited resources available to the board. The discussion revealed a notable gap in communication among township departments, which both the resident and board members found troubling.

Despite the issues, one board member confirmed that the dogs are now licensed, and a formal complaint has been lodged with the court. However, the overarching concerns about departmental coordination and enforcement procedures remain unresolved. The board expressed a willingness to further review the situation, though there was uncertainty about whether these issues fell under their jurisdiction or that of the Town Council.

Among these, the health officer reported on inspections carried out in October, with establishments like Piece of Chocolate and the Cranbury Inn receiving satisfactory ratings. A dog complaint from October was dismissed, and another about resident care was passed to the appropriate long-term care hotline. The environmental report noted a rejected plan for a property on Brickyard Road and confirmed that E. coli samples from Brainard Lake were compliant.

The board also reviewed old business regarding the scheduling of a rabies clinic. Efforts to secure a veterinarian continued, with attempts to contact Dr. Manay still pending. The board discussed whether financial compensation for veterinarians should be considered, acknowledging any payments would need township budget approval.

New business included reminders about the upcoming dog and cat license renewals, with licenses valid through January and late fees starting in February. Summonses could be issued from March for unlicensed pets. Two board members were mentioned for renewal, with their responses slated for township committee consideration.

Public comments provided additional community feedback. Another resident expressed frustration over unlicensed dogs roaming freely, referencing a letter sent to the mayor and chief of police. The board reiterated the three-minute limit for public commentary to maintain order and ensure diverse participation.