The most discussion centered around Policy 5756, which addresses the treatment and rights of transgender students within the school district. This policy became a focal point of contention during the public comment period. Several community members conveyed their apprehensions, particularly regarding parental notification and involvement when students express a desire to transition their gender identity at school.

Reverend Elaine Santo, an educator with a background in educational leadership, voiced concerns about the lack of parental notification stipulated by the policy. She stressed the importance of parents being the first to know if their children are experiencing distress and questioned how the board could enforce a policy that might leave parents uninformed about issues affecting their children. Reverend Santo’s comments were mirrored by Father James Hutchins, who argued that the policy undermines parental rights and responsibilities, asserting that parents should be the primary protectors of their children.

Adding to the discourse, Tony Darpino, a Galloway resident, criticized the board for not maintaining the level of effective communication he experienced with teachers regarding the policy. He highlighted that the parental notification aspect of Policy 5756 has been contentious in various legal disputes across different municipalities.

During these public comments, some residents expressed concerns that the policy could lead to significant family and societal implications, including potential conflicts with parental beliefs in areas such as sports participation and facility usage by transgender students. The speakers consistently emphasized a belief that the policy undermines parental authority and fails to adequately inform parents about their children’s experiences in school.

In response, a board member advised directing specific concerns to Superintendent Stephen Santilli after the meeting, which prompted frustration from some attendees who were seeking immediate answers and accountability during the public forum.

This silence was interpreted by some as an indication of the board’s reluctance to engage openly with the concerns raised by the public.

Another moment during the meeting involved a presentation by Riley Pelino, a former student and Life Scout, who proposed an Eagle Scout project to enhance Mr. Be’s backyard with observation benches. Aiming to foster student engagement with nature, Pelino assured the board that materials would be sourced through donations, and the project would commence after the holidays. The board expressed support for this initiative, which will likely proceed without further action required.

In addition to these discussions, the board recognized student achievements in various areas. Students were honored for their accomplishments in a recycled arts contest, with Ethan Stoel and Amalia McLo receiving special recognition for their creative entries. Moreover, students whose artwork was selected for the 2025 district calendar were acknowledged and celebrated during the meeting.

The board also addressed routine administrative matters, including the approval of curriculum and instruction agenda items, financial motions, and personnel resolutions. Notably, the board unanimously approved a resolution accepting the retirement of Miss Christina Bower, effective at the end of 2024. These motions were passed without dissent.

Additionally, the board heard updates on upcoming events, such as winter concerts and a book swap hosted by the GTEA. There were also reminders about Steam Nights scheduled for early 2024, aimed at promoting science, technology, engineering, arts, and mathematics education within the district.

As the meeting drew to a close, a board member expressed frustration over the perceived lack of participation among board members in state and local advocacy opportunities. The member urged colleagues to engage more in their roles, emphasizing the responsibility to represent and serve the community effectively.