The proposed fitness center on D Drive became a focal point as commission members expressed concerns over its site plans. The absence of a sufficient buffer zone was a primary issue, with emphasis on the proposed septic system being only ten feet from a property line. Members emphasized the need for a minimum 50-foot buffer, with some suggesting a 100-foot buffer to mitigate noise and environmental impact from the HVAC system and to protect neighboring wells. Historical context was provided, recalling past public health issues related to inadequate wastewater management at a nearby bar.

In response to the proposal, members stressed the necessity for relocating the septic system to ensure a proper buffer and protect existing wells. The discussion underlined frustration with unclear documentation on well and septic locations, prompting a call for better adherence to health department regulations, especially regarding the abandonment of old systems. The commission agreed to submit specific comments addressing these concerns, advocating for thorough documentation to assess environmental and health risks accurately.

A separate discussion ensued regarding a property seeking a 50-foot buffer, which the commission deemed insufficient. Members debated the proposal’s safety and environmental implications, with strong sentiments about the proximity of such developments to residential areas. The dialogue also touched on a proposed addition on Butches Lane, where the planned structure would encroach five feet closer to the property line than allowable. The lack of comprehensive plans and specific environmental impact details further fueled concerns, prompting the commission to consider submitting comments on the insufficiency of information provided.

Moving to administrative matters, the commission discussed the upcoming expiration of several members’ terms and the process for nominating new members. The current nomination method involves a letter-writing system, which some members found unfamiliar. There was an acknowledgment of the need for greater visibility and interaction among commission members, with suggestions to improve the nomination process and ensure a diverse and engaged membership.

The meeting also touched on procedural changes, with a proposal to reschedule the next meeting from the 23rd to the 30th of the month to accommodate a member’s attendance. This change required updating the public and the commission’s website to reflect the new date. Additionally, fundraising efforts from Community Day were reviewed, with discussions on how to allocate the $30 raised from book sales. Suggestions included using the money for snacks during cleanup events, with a proposal to store the funds in a labeled envelope for future use.

The commission evaluated the effectiveness of continuing meetings via Zoom, especially since a member announced plans to relocate and could no longer attend in person after December. This prompted discussions on the necessity of finding a replacement member and the procedural requirements for membership continuity. The commission stressed the importance of sending timely letters to the township committee to secure positions and ensure representation at planning board meetings.

Conversations also included updates on Mala Lake Park’s maintenance efforts, including the relocation of a trail map drop-off box to accommodate new trail routes. The group discussed contacting public works for assistance in managing the park’s layout changes and the installation of new playground equipment, although the status of old equipment remained unclear.