1:26:30The MBTA’s proposal involves constructing approximately 4,500 linear feet of turnback track near existing mainline tracks to improve commuter rail service. This project is intended to facilitate a 30-minute train service from Reading Station to Boston by allowing trains to clear the station more efficiently. The new track will be situated within the MBTA’s right-of-way, with a focus on minimizing direct wetland impact through the use of ballast material for the track bed.

The commission’s discussions highlighted several environmental concerns. There was a particular focus on the proximity of the proposed track to wetlands and the potential for tree removal in sensitive areas. A Vernal pool near the site and the implications of the project’s jurisdictional boundaries were examined, with discrepancies in measurements prompting further scrutiny. The representative assured the commission that no significant trees were anticipated to be affected and that removed materials would be transported away from jurisdictional boundaries.

2:04:17Public concerns were also voiced, with residents expressing apprehension over diesel fumes and potential leaks from trains. One resident urged the commission to consider relocating the track to a commercial area to minimize the environmental and residential impact. The MBTA representative explained the operational necessity of the current location, emphasizing signal requirements and timing issues that make alternative locations less feasible.

1:45:38The commission and public participants discussed the project’s technical aspects, including the removal of unsuitable organic materials and the installation of conduits for the signaling system. The MBTA representative noted the project’s goal of reducing train travel time by installing a second track, which would take place under a legal exemption for underground utility installation.

2:45:29Further into the meeting, the commission addressed the installation of a dog watering station without proper permits. Concerns about erosion control and the potential environmental impact near wetlands were raised. The commission debated issuing an enforcement order to ensure compliance with the Wetlands Protection Act, emphasizing the importance of holding all entities accountable, including town departments.

In another notable discussion, the commission considered a project on Pearl Street, where deviations from the approved plan were identified. An enforcement order was issued to halt activities except for maintaining erosion control after it was discovered that a retaining wall was constructed instead of the proposed V-shaped bank and vegetation. The commission planned a site visit to assess the situation and determine any violations.

1:04:15The commission also reviewed a project concerning the construction of an inground pool on Scotland Road. The applicant provided documentation verifying no mature trees would be cut, and all soil would be removed from the site. The commission discussed saltwater pool maintenance strategies to prevent environmental impact and emphasized the importance of safety measures, such as an automatic safety cover or fence, particularly for children.

0:00Members underscored the necessity of clear communication, adherence to regulations, and the importance of maintaining the integrity of local wetlands and conservation areas.