The proposal for the storage facility, described as being strategically located on vacant land at the town boundary, was outlined. The site’s proximity to critical wetlands necessitated a clear plan to minimize environmental intrusion. The representative, referred to as G., detailed the delineation of the wetlands, which had been recently updated, emphasizing adherence to a 50-foot no-disturb zone and a 100-foot buffer zone. Despite the majority of construction being designed to avoid these sensitive areas, a small section would encroach into the 100-foot buffer. Proposed erosion control measures included the installation of silt socks and fencing, as well as a stormwater management system designed to manage runoff and release water at reduced rates compared to pre-development conditions.

Phil Clemens from T Associates confirmed the accuracy of the wetland delineation, noting the property’s inclusion in a state-recognized priority habitat. The commission members probed the necessity and function of the proposed erosion controls, particularly the dual use of silt socks and fences, which were clarified to serve distinct protective roles. Discussions underscored the importance of these measures as standard practice in safeguarding adjacent woodlands and street areas from sediment disruption.

Concerns extended beyond immediate environmental measures to include logistics such as emergency vehicle access and snow removal practices. A 24-foot-wide roadway was designed for emergencies, though no comments had been received from the fire department regarding its adequacy. Snow removal was another point of discussion; an audience member questioned the impact on the buffer zones. The applicant acknowledged that snow would generally accumulate at the pavement’s edge but agreed to conditions preventing encroachment into protected areas.

Following the comprehensive examination of the proposal, the commission voted unanimously to close the hearing, contingent upon the installation of signage delineating the 50-foot buffer zone to prevent unauthorized encroachments. The commission also decided to issue a standard order of conditions, requiring compliance with NHSP regulations and explicitly prohibiting snow storage within buffer zones. Updated plans reflecting these conditions were requested from the applicant.

Attention then shifted to administrative updates and enforcement actions concerning other properties. The commission addressed non-compliance issues at multiple sites, including 111 River Street and Plymouth Street, where enforcement letters had been drafted or issued due to lapses in regulatory adherence. These cases highlighted ongoing challenges in ensuring compliance across the town’s development projects.

The commission also discussed the potential appointment of John Guod to its ranks. His candidacy received unanimous support from the commission, pending an interview by the Board of Selectmen.

Finally, procedural matters such as the approval of meeting schedules and minutes were addressed. The commission reviewed its upcoming meeting calendar, including a session close to Christmas. Members discussed the possibility of canceling the December 17 meeting due to a light agenda and potential conflicts with town events.