The board devoted considerable attention to the growing concern around cell phone use in schools. The superintendent addressed the issue, acknowledging that a complete ban on cell phones was not feasible. Instead, he proposed a coordinated community effort to address the potential dangers associated with these devices. He pointed out the challenges surrounding students’ focus and emotional responses when separated from their phones, emphasizing the need for responsible usage education rather than outright prohibitions. The superintendent suggested that policy changes might be considered for the 2025-2026 school year, reflecting similar moves by surrounding districts.

The conversation about cell phones tied into broader discussions on student behavior, particularly the impact of social media on interactions and conflicts. Data presented during the meeting revealed a 39% increase in reported violence and vandalism incidents compared to the previous year, though these figures still marked a decline from two years prior. The superintendent underscored the importance of restorative practices and social-emotional learning to address these issues, while also acknowledging the ongoing need for improvement.

A presentation by Iselda Neptune, the manager of school support, provided a detailed look at data collection efforts, including HIP investigations and suspension statistics. The data pointed to the steps being taken by school principals to understand behavioral trends and implement effective interventions. The report emphasized the significance of context in interpreting these numbers, particularly in the face of fluctuating data over the years.

The board’s discussions also touched on the role of restorative justice practices within schools. A restorative justice hub, established with a grant from the Juvenile Justice Commission, aims to support students and families facing challenges. However, concerns were raised about the integration between the district and the hub, with questions about the vendor managing the initiative. The board expressed enthusiasm for potential partnerships with local programs, such as boxing, to provide students with constructive outlets for conflict resolution.

The Parent Connect series, described as a “Parent Empowerment Series,” is one initiative aimed at providing support for parents dealing with issues like social media pressures and child custody. The series offers monthly sessions at different schools, fostering an intimate environment for discussion and problem-solving. Attendance figures show consistent engagement.

The board also addressed the challenges of managing bullying, particularly in the context of social media and cyberbullying. Board members emphasized the necessity of documenting incidents through specific reporting forms to initiate investigations. The complexities of regulating external social media interactions were acknowledged.

The superintendent mentioned ongoing recruitment efforts within the district, with 19 new hiring opportunities available. Updates on infrastructure projects, such as the stalled demolition of the old Junior 1 building, were also presented.

Public comments during the meeting brought additional issues to the forefront. Sandra Marin, a concerned parent, raised the issue of her child’s one-to-one placement, which had been affected by a paraeducator’s resignation. In response, the special education department, in collaboration with Kelly Services, was working to fill the vacancy. Another public commenter, Michael Jones, requested support for his child with dyslexia, prompting assurances from the assistant superintendent of continued follow-up.

Concerns about the establishment of a weed store near a preschool sparked strong opposition from a community member. He voiced the importance of advocating for children’s safety and urged collective action against the proposed location. The board expressed a commitment to attending an upcoming planning board meeting to address these concerns.