During the public comment session, residents voiced their concerns about the adverse impacts of PILOT agreements on the school district’s financial health. A speaker highlighted the dilemma the board faces in promoting the referendum while remaining silent on PILOTs. They argued that developers should not be exempt from contributing to school funding, especially when educational quality is a key reason families choose to live in Princeton. The speaker expressed fears that such financial arrangements would strain taxpayers and urged the board to take a firm stance against PILOT agreements.

The discussion of PILOTs was further fueled by another resident who questioned their suitability for Princeton, a well-established municipality, as opposed to urban areas with distressed properties. The resident voiced concerns about a developer’s use of an LLC to qualify for a PILOT. Both residents called for transparency and advocacy from the school board to protect the educational resources and priorities of the community.

In response to these concerns, the board assured attendees that they are committed to maintaining open communication with the community. They emphasized the significance of providing clear information about the upcoming referendum, including FAQs and opportunities for tours and forums available on the district’s website.

The meeting also featured tributes to three departing board members—Rob Christopher, Brian McDonald, and Betsy Baglio—who collectively dedicated 18 years of service to the district. Each member was recognized for their unique contributions and leadership roles, leaving a lasting impact on the board’s strategic direction and the educational landscape of Princeton public schools. The tributes acknowledged their dedication to student achievement and their efforts in enhancing community connections.

Transitioning to educational initiatives, the board welcomed a presentation on an innovative science project involving sourdough bread baking. Led by teachers Alexis Kuster and Shannon Barlo, the project integrated scientific concepts with culinary arts, allowing students to explore microorganisms involved in fermentation. The project received praise from board members for its experiential learning approach, highlighting the benefits of combining science with everyday activities.

In addition to these educational highlights, the board discussed the development of guidelines for Artificial Intelligence (AI) use in classrooms. A student board member expressed curiosity about AI’s integration in learning, noting the lack of clear guidelines for its use in assignments. In response, a district representative confirmed that AI usage guidelines were completed and would be included in syllabi. Upcoming professional development sessions aim to ensure a uniform understanding among staff and students regarding AI’s role in education.

The board also addressed academic integrity concerns, with a student suggesting the formation of an academic integrity council to refine the honor code and address violations, particularly related to AI usage. The proposal was well-received, with board representatives acknowledging the importance of fostering values of honesty and providing support rather than relying solely on punitive measures.

The meeting concluded with updates from various committees, including the Operations Committee, which reported on a $577,000 bid for heating and cooling systems at Princeton Middle School and the completion of the PHS cafeteria project. The Long-Term Planning Committee discussed efforts to educate voters about the upcoming referendum, emphasizing the use of nearly $20 million in state funding for infrastructure improvements.