The meeting opened with a discussion of the inadequacies of the existing facilities, which date back over 140 years and lack essential amenities such as private meeting spaces and adequate kitchen facilities. Accessibility remains a concern, with current configurations placing registration areas in hallways and an absence of ground-floor restrooms. These limitations have prompted the committee to propose a new center that would address these issues while providing an inclusive environment for community engagement.

Representatives from Turner Townsend, the project management firm, presented demographic data underscoring the necessity of this new center. With over one-third of Reading households containing at least one member aged 60 or older, there’s a pressing need to mitigate social isolation and improve economic security for seniors. The committee’s plan includes creating a designated senior hub that extends beyond traditional hours, incorporates safety and accessibility features, and is environmentally conscious.

The proposed RECAL facility is designed to serve as a multi-generational community center. Feedback from community forums, attended by over 170 participants, revealed a strong preference for an inclusive space that accommodates a variety of needs, including evening and weekend activities. The center would provide essential services such as meals, computer classes, and private meeting areas, addressing ongoing challenges like transportation and high housing costs.

The committee conducted a review of potential sites, ultimately selecting Simon’s Way as the preferred location. The unanimous decision followed detailed evaluations of six sites, taking into account parking availability, accessibility, and community impact. The new center’s design includes a building with parking for 94 vehicles, with provisions for additional spaces if necessary. Outdoor facilities like pickleball courts have been proposed, designed to manage noise and parking concerns.

Architectural plans emphasize accessibility, with the proposed layout featuring single-user, handicapped-accessible restrooms and strategically positioned offices to enhance safety. The design includes a variety of social spaces, including a café lounge, card room, and gym, all aimed at fostering interaction among residents. A key feature of the facility is its accessibility for all ages, with dedicated entry points and program areas that accommodate both senior and community needs.

Financial considerations were also a focal point of the meeting. The town maintains a strong financial position, allocating a portion of its budget to debt and capital expenditures while minimizing borrowing. The town’s CFO assured residents of manageable tax implications, noting potential reductions in tax burdens following the completion of current debt payments.

Discussions also addressed the timing of presenting the RECAL project alongside other major initiatives, such as the Killing School project. The committee emphasized transparency and the importance of informing the public to avoid past pitfalls experienced during library project votes.

Concerns about the project’s framing as a “community center” versus a dedicated senior center were raised, with residents expressing apprehension about the financial impact. The committee clarified that while the primary focus would be on senior programs, there would be provisions for broader community use during evenings and weekends. Cost savings discussions revealed that reductions in gym space would not result in proportionate savings, as fixed costs are a significant component of the project budget.