The council’s deliberation on selecting a lobbying firm was marked by a thorough evaluation of five contenders, with Mark Anderson Governmental Consulting emerging as the top choice with a perfect score of 100. The council’s decision to proceed with Anderson was driven by the necessity to secure representation ahead of key legislative appropriation deadlines. The council discussed the potential for a contract with Anderson if the fee remained below $4,000 per month, although discussions suggested the fee would likely be around $3,000. The urgency in finalizing the contract arose from impending deadlines for legislative appropriations, necessitating submission by February 14.

Amid these discussions, concerns surfaced about unsolicited offers from other lobbyists, including one individual proposing a lower fee of $11,000 per month. The council member who received these offers emphasized the importance of maintaining transparency in the selection process, expressing reservations about considering unsolicited proposals. They stressed the importance of ensuring the decision-making process remained focused on formally submitted candidates and highlighted the potential risks of choosing larger firms that might not prioritize Perry’s interests. The council collectively recognized the need for accountability and the value of multiple lobbying options to ensure Perry’s needs were effectively represented in the legislative arena.

The council also engaged in a discussion concerning the traffic management at the intersection of Center and Green Streets. With differing opinions on maintaining the current four-way stop or reinstating a traffic light, the council aimed to address traffic flow challenges, particularly during school hours. While some participants advocated for the four-way stop, noting residents’ appreciation and the potential risk of damage to a reinstated traffic light by large trucks, others highlighted the difficulties faced by vehicles on Green Street during peak school traffic.

A proposal to install a timer for the traffic light to operate during school hours was considered, though concerns about potential confusion led to a consensus to maintain the four-way stop until debris trucks completed their work.

The meeting further addressed the intricate topic of zoning regulations for food trucks, a matter that has garnered attention due to inconsistent guidance provided to operators. Concerns were raised about the lack of understanding among city residents regarding zoning processes and the potential need for updated regulations in light of evolving state laws. The council recognized that the current zoning board and adjustment board, composed of the same individuals, might not adequately reflect contemporary needs.

Uncertainty regarding health and fire inspection requirements further complicated the issue, with reports of some food trucks operating without undergoing necessary inspections, raising public safety concerns. The council acknowledged the need for improved coordination between the health department, fire department, and city officials to ensure compliance and safety.

As the meeting concluded, the council emphasized the importance of reevaluating zoning laws and procedures to facilitate better operations for food trucks and other businesses in Perry. The council members agreed on the necessity for clearer communication and guidance to support food truck operators while prioritizing public health and safety. The topic is set to remain on the agenda for future meetings.