The proposal outlined during the meeting includes a cooperative model with Central Lakes College, though it may result in higher costs. Specific costs associated with the CIS program were discussed, including a $3,000 fee for a calculus section taught by John Morgan, which offers five college credits to students. The board emphasized the importance of maintaining accredited classes, noting that courses with a 1400 level at Central Lakes College are transferable to various state universities, enabling students to earn valuable credits before graduating high school.

A significant concern revolved around the financial implications of the CIS program, especially for science courses such as college chemistry. The need for credentialed staff from the college to teach these courses is expected to increase costs substantially, with estimates reaching $112,000 for two sections of college chemistry. The board acknowledged the necessity of clear communication with students and families regarding these changes and potential costs.

Discussions also touched on expanding the CIS offerings to include courses in social studies, an area with historically limited college credit opportunities due to staffing credentials. Notably, the introduction of an Introduction to Sociology course taught by Little Falls alum Mateline Wright was proposed. The board highlighted the significance of providing students with diverse options to earn college credits, emphasizing the popularity of courses like College Freshman English and English Literature.

In addition to educational programs, the meeting addressed ongoing projects and initiatives within the district. Preparations for the daycare center’s opening on March 10th were a focal point, with final testing of the boiler scheduled soon. The board also discussed the progress of the cquad softball field and the Middle School pool’s maintenance, including sand filtration media replacement.

Another topic was the district’s property tax levy for 2025. The board presented the proposed levy increase of 3.23%, amounting to an additional $182,000, to the public. It was noted that local property tax levies are influenced by state-set revenue formulas and that the concept of equalization in school finance has declined, potentially impacting future levies. The board clarified that changes in the levy do not necessarily correlate with increased revenue but rather reflect adjustments in aid and local tax contributions.

The board reviewed the 2024-2025 budget, focusing on the general fund, which accounts for standard operations. Despite a 2% increase in the state’s basic formula allowance, declining enrollment may lead to a financial shortfall. The expenditure budget decreased by 1.65%, following substantial budget cuts in the spring, with 75% of the general fund directed towards salaries and benefits.

Attention was given to the district’s unassigned fund balance, which was reported at about $1.46 million, below the board’s policy target of 5-7%. The basic formula allowance’s gap compared to inflation was emphasized, highlighting the financial challenges faced by the district.

The board concluded by discussing the necessity of certifying the maximum allowable levy, a routine process mandated by the state. The proposed tax levy, detailed in the resolution, included allocations for maintenance, community services, and debt service, totaling $5,821,275. The resolution was approved unanimously following a roll call vote.