The board addressed the condition of Fair Haven’s sewer system, noting varying ages across different areas. The conversation suggested there were no immediate plans for pump station upgrades, but highlighted ongoing coordination with utility companies during street paving to ensure necessary infrastructure improvements.

Stormwater management was another concern, with the board emphasizing the need to reduce stormwater entering sewers by 10% through the implementation of bio-retention systems and porous pavements. A report by Rutgers was cited.

The board also explored the viability of solar installations on municipal buildings, concluding that it was not cost-effective due to the buildings’ low energy usage and the structural upgrades required for solar panels. Alternative approaches, such as partnerships with contractors to install solar systems without municipal ownership, were considered as potential solutions to enhance energy efficiency.

In the realm of environmental planning, the meeting highlighted the need to integrate electric vehicle (EV) charging capabilities into future infrastructure plans. Although no strict regulations mandate a specific number of EV charging stations per parking lot size, the board acknowledged the importance of considering these elements in the master plan.

Affordable housing emerged as a topic, with the board noting the looming deadline for the council to provide a resolution by January 31st. If the resolution is accepted, it allows for negotiations on the number of units required, while rejection would necessitate court filings by February. The board acknowledged past involvement in affordable housing discussions and expressed a desire to reappoint the committee to ensure active participation in future negotiations.

Public facilities and assets were also reviewed, with attention given to the borough’s waterfront, the fire station’s maintenance responsibilities, and the condition of community centers and sports facilities. The board highlighted the need for improvements at Fisk Chapel, with ADA upgrades and exterior painting funded by a historic trust grant. Concerns about the aging concession stand at Fair Haven Fields led to discussions on replacing the roof and HVAC system due to increased wear from sports activities.

The meeting concluded with a focus on the master plan’s future direction. While some members questioned whether a full rewrite or a reexamination was necessary, the board leaned towards a reexamination due to cost considerations. A comprehensive rewrite could involve expenses up to $110,000, whereas a reexamination would be less costly and allow for targeted updates in specific areas like utilities and facilities.