The resurfacing of pickleball courts at Gregory Park emerged as a focal point. A local group showed enthusiasm for funding the project, but the board faced a dilemma in deciding whether to repurpose existing tennis courts for pickleball. A member voiced reluctance, stating, “I have a hard time removing any amenity for another amenity when that amenity is in good condition.” This comment captured the board’s challenge in addressing the needs of both tennis and pickleball players.

The board acknowledged the importance of keeping open lines of communication with the tennis community. The idea of creating a dual-use facility was briefly considered, though the pickleball group’s preference for exclusive usage was noted. There was consensus on the need to gather input from tennis players before making any definitive decisions. Suggestions included implementing a wristband system to organize play times.

Discussion also turned to the financial aspects of the proposal, with an estimated budget of $75,000, which included necessary infrastructure like nets and poles. The board deliberated on aligning the project timeline with fundraising efforts.

The urgency of resolving the pickleball court issue was emphasized, with aspirations for the courts to become a regional hub for the sport, potentially attracting players from within a 40-mile radius. The board considered inviting representatives from the pickleball association to present their fundraising strategies at the next meeting, highlighting the broader regional impact of enhanced pickleball facilities.

In addition to pickleball, the board explored a new banner program for baseball fields, introduced by Dave Bedle from Brainerd Community Action. The Brainerd Backer Baseball Association proposed purchasing four new scoreboards for youth baseball fields, citing frequent malfunctions with the current equipment. Bedle outlined plans for the scoreboards to be accessible via mobile apps. The association offered to cover the $25,000 cost, seeking management of the banner program in return to recoup their investment.

Bedle suggested revamping the banner program to optimize its revenue-generating potential. He proposed that funds raised from banner sales be allocated directly to specific park amenities, creating a sustainable funding model. The board responded positively, recognizing the need for a cohesive visual identity across park banners and the potential for increased community engagement through advertising and sponsorship.

The board also discussed the possibility of extending the banner program to other sports and park activities, such as pickleball and dog parks. This holistic approach aimed to improve community involvement and funding for recreational facilities.

Furthering community engagement, the board considered establishing a work group to facilitate communication with various sports groups, including tennis and pickleball enthusiasts. Improved dialogue was seen as key to making informed decisions about resource allocation and addressing concerns about facility usage.

The meeting included updates on staff changes and upcoming events, with a new recreation specialist set to begin soon. This position will focus on promoting special events in the downtown area. Board members shared personal insights, with one expressing eagerness to make Brainerd a central hub for pickleball, while another emphasized the importance of maintaining Lum Park’s beach for summer use.