The most attention-grabbing issue of the meeting revolved around the proposed removal of Pride flags and other symbols of inclusion from classrooms. Public comments revealed deep concerns from students and parents alike about the implications of such policies on the school environment. Morgan Deisa, a student, expressed a strong opposition to the ban, emphasizing how it contradicts the school’s message of providing a safe and inclusive space for all students. Deisa articulated a sentiment that banning these symbols fosters division and an “us versus them” mentality, urging the board to reconsider in favor of building a supportive community.

Virgil Grassic, another student, highlighted the historical challenges faced by the LGBTQ+ community and questioned why heterosexual identities are normalized while others are marginalized. Grassic called for a consistent and visible support system within the school, lamenting the current instability. Lucas Bernaldo, a parent, argued that the proposed policies infringe upon First Amendment rights, citing Supreme Court decisions that protect free speech and expression in schools. He criticized the board for potentially supporting a petition to ban Pride flags and warned that such actions could silence marginalized voices, thereby sending a harmful message.

Mackenzie Taylor, a student, further stressed the importance of Pride flags as symbols of acceptance and inclusion, arguing against the notion of a sterile, purely academic environment. Taylor pointed out that a bland school atmosphere would be uninviting and would not foster a safe space for all students.

Beyond the discussions on Pride flags, the meeting also addressed concerns about a $92 million referendum scheduled for March 11. Regina Senza, a community member, criticized the district’s communication efforts regarding the referendum, noting that many residents were unaware of the initiative due to poorly attended and publicized information sessions. Denise Viaro echoed these sentiments, emphasizing the need for better outreach to taxpayers without children in the school system.

The board also announced the formation of a new superintendent search committee, which includes several board members. The committee plans to start interviewing candidates soon and has invited the public to participate in an online survey to gather input on expectations for the new superintendent.

In another update, the board discussed the purchase of bulletproof vests for School Security Officers. The decision raised various perspectives, with discussions reflecting concerns over safety measures in schools. The district is coordinating with the police department’s vendor to facilitate the purchase.

The meeting also included updates on land survey quotes for multiple schools, discussions on the budget for the 2025-26 school year, and updates on ongoing searches for an assistant head custodian and a transportation coordinator. The superintendent emphasized the importance of waiting for state approval before disseminating detailed information about the referendum to avoid misinformation, with communication efforts slated to begin in early January.

Student achievements were also recognized during the meeting, with students being honored for their academic and extracurricular accomplishments. Principal King introduced two seniors of the month, Mia and Mel, highlighting their commitments to academics, community service, sports, and the arts. The recognition of Cedar Creek and Lacey Harbor schools by the U.S. News and World Report as among the best elementary schools in the state was also noted.