The most notable issue revolved around the development project on Speed Street, where residents expressed strong opposition to the proposed building’s height and design. Richard Foster, a resident on Pond Street, voiced his frustrations about not being recognized in previous meetings and raised concerns over the project’s impact on his condo complex’s quality of life. He criticized the proposed structure as a “big square concrete building” that would overshadow existing mature trees, reduce natural light, and obstruct views. Foster questioned the classification of the new building, arguing that despite being labeled as a one-story structure, its height would rival that of a three-story building. Additionally, he raised concerns about the visibility of air conditioning units on the roof.

Susan Adler, another resident of 226 Pond Street, echoed Foster’s concerns and sought clarification on the project’s timeline and the nature of the continuance. She expressed frustration over unresolved issues related to the building’s design and parking arrangements. The board acknowledged these concerns, noting that the continuance would allow for further public participation and input from the town council on zoning matters. The discussion of the Speed Street project was deferred to January 15, 2025, with assurances that the public would be informed of any developments.

In another key agenda item, the board reviewed the development at 216-218 South Main Street. The project, which required a stormwater management permit, faced scrutiny over the proposed deletion of a trail due to drainage concerns. Amanda, from the planning department, explained the necessity of this change to enhance stormwater management. However, board member Doug challenged the decision, emphasizing the trail’s importance as part of the project’s open space features. The town engineer, Bill McDowell, explained that the trail’s current placement posed risks of washout and significant water flow during extreme weather, necessitating its removal. Despite this explanation, Doug and other board members insisted on a review of the stormwater management plan and the trail’s integration into the project, highlighting the need for a complete submission package before final approval.

The meeting also tackled the proposed redevelopment of the historic Elliot School at Five Auburn Street into a 100% affordable housing development. The project, presented by Metro West Collaborative, aims to offer 32 rental units for families earning up to 60% of the area median income. While the board generally supported the project’s goals, concerns were raised about parking configurations and the impact on the neighborhood.

Architectural design was another focal point, with critiques about the new building’s massing and scale in relation to the historic Elliot School. Cliff Ballmer from Davis Square Architects acknowledged the Historic District Commission’s feedback and emphasized efforts to preserve the historic building’s character. However, several board members expressed dissatisfaction with the new building’s design. The board proposed that the team return with updated designs for further review, advocating for a collaborative approach to ensure the project’s success.

Additional discussions touched on the design and environmental considerations at the Auburn Street development site. The planning team presented a tree removal plan aimed at preserving key trees while ensuring emergency vehicle access. Concerns about parking were also raised, with discussions on how to manage parking allocations effectively to prevent overflow onto local streets.

As the meeting concluded, the board addressed scheduling conflicts in their 2025 calendar, opting to adjust meeting dates to avoid school vacation weeks and potential conflicts with town meetings. The board deferred the discussion of annual town meeting zoning articles to a future meeting and adjourned with a motion, wishing each other a happy holiday season.