The application for a zoning variance on Al Lane was a focal point of the meeting. The applicant sought approval to construct a one-car garage addition, requiring a side setback of 27 feet instead of the required 30 feet. The property, located in a residential district with specific dimensional requirements, presented unique challenges due to its irregular shape and the existing dwelling’s location. The applicant’s engineer elaborated on these constraints, arguing that alternative placements would obstruct a kitchen window and disrupt the property’s aesthetic. The additional impervious coverage was noted to remain well within acceptable limits, and assurances were provided that water diversion would not be an issue.

Public comments were mixed, with some supporting the proposal and others raising concerns. The Board had to deliberate on whether the strict application of zoning regulations would pose an exceptional hardship for the applicant. After reviewing the application and the property’s specific conditions, the Board concluded that the variance request was reasonable and aligned with neighborhood standards, ultimately granting approval for the garage construction.

Another application involved the demolition of an existing barn on Turn Lane and the construction of a new building featuring a garage, greenhouse, and office space. The property, characterized by its large, irregular shape, had undergone a lot line adjustment in 2015, leading to discrepancies in impervious coverage. The applicant, identified as Gregory T., testified about the restoration efforts and the barn’s unsound structure, with plans to utilize the existing foundation for the new construction. Architect John Bey discussed the design, which aimed to minimize visual impact and address coverage issues by removing part of the gravel driveway.

The Board focused on ensuring the new structure would enhance the property without adversely affecting the surrounding area. They evaluated the proposal against General Welfare criteria, determining that it met the necessary standards without negatively impacting the neighborhood. However, discrepancies in numerical details concerning frontage and impervious coverage raised concerns among Board members, emphasizing the need for accuracy in the application process. The Board agreed to consult with the board engineer and other involved parties to clarify and rectify these discrepancies before finalizing the application.

The meeting also included a review of an application for an inground swimming pool and associated patio at a single-family residence. The applicant proposed constructing a 20 by 40-foot swimming pool and a 1,220-square-foot patio, necessitating a side setback variance. The property’s steep slopes required careful consideration of the pool’s location to minimize visual impact and manage water runoff within engineering recommendations.

Architect Alexander Rodriguez confirmed the design’s compliance with neighborhood standards, and Licensed Engineering Surveyor Mark Mella reassured the Board that the development would adhere to coverage requirements. Land planner Frank Bish supported the application, stating that it met the criteria for granting the requested variances and would enhance the property. After thorough discussion, the Board approved the application, contingent upon compliance with conditions outlined in the resolution, including revisions to plans and surface runoff management.

The session concluded with discussions on pending applications for P Real Estate and the Met Farm estate, highlighting the ongoing nature of the Board’s work. Technical issues related to meeting access via Zoom were also noted, with indications of public access confusion. The meeting wrapped up with a motion to adjourn, which was seconded and unanimously approved.