The most significant topic of the meeting was the Council’s intensive debate on the Shade Tree Commission’s budget and operations. Concerns were raised about the substantial increase in the commission’s budget from $3,175 in 2012 to $177,400 last year. This spike occurred after a transfer of funds from another budget, prompting scrutiny over the commission’s spending and management practices, especially when compared to neighboring towns in Morris County, whose budgets ranged from $2,500 to $29,000.

The Council expressed apprehension about the lack of a structured plan for tree maintenance and expenditures. Criticism was directed toward the commission’s reliance on a single contractor for both assessments and execution of tree-related work, raising potential conflicts of interest. The absence of checks and balances was a focal point, with calls for better accountability and transparency in using taxpayer dollars.

A council member proposed hiring a third-party arborist on an hourly basis to objectively evaluate trees recommended for action. This suggestion came in light of data from a New Jersey League of Municipalities presentation indicating that the risk of tree-related fatalities is extremely low. The council member emphasized the need for an impartial perspective in decision-making, especially regarding tree safety and health evaluations.

The council also considered the implications of upcoming state legislation, specifically a new tree ordinance requiring residents to obtain permits for certain tree removals. This ordinance highlighted the necessity for knowledgeable personnel to review permits and assess trees against removal criteria. Additionally, a legislative bill, A426, could prohibit municipalities from adopting ordinances controlling replanting, influencing future tree management strategies.

Budgetary constraints were another concern, with discussions on a $20,000 funding request for tree work that was denied. While some council members stressed the importance of staying within budget, others argued that safety should not be compromised. The debate underscored differing views on safety versus budget pressures, leading to a consensus on the importance of establishing a clear, structured tree management plan.

The Council’s conversation then shifted to flood management, focusing on the preliminary flood maps from FEMA, which were open for public comment for 30 days. The Council’s engineer and a council member, Nancy Verga, were set to attend a meeting at the County Police Academy to gather more information. The Council acknowledged the maps’ significance, as they could influence local flood management strategies and community safety.

In terms of community development, the Council celebrated the installation of a rotary clock, which was seen as a positive addition to the borough. They also discussed a grant opportunity from America Walks, aimed at fostering healthy, active communities. The grant could potentially enhance the Trail Grant, but with only six awards available at $2,000 each, competition was expected to be intense.

The Council deliberated on a request for community center usage by an applicant from Morris Township associated with the Special Olympics. The program, aimed at young athletes, was scheduled for six consecutive Saturdays. Traditionally, Morris Plains residents have been prioritized for community center applications, but the applicant’s affiliation with a commendable cause prompted consideration. Concerns about scheduling conflicts were addressed, with assurances that the applicant was willing to adjust room usage as needed.