The focal point of the meeting was the extensive discussion around the peer review process for the properties on Lemonster Road, 795 Lemonster Road, and Kilburn Street. The board acknowledged the financial implications for applicants, with costs potentially reaching up to $6,000, while the previous limit was set at $2,000 per review. Concerns were raised about whether the corrections identified through these reviews justify the expense for applicants. One board member pointed out the balance between necessary oversight and imposing financial burdens on developers. The importance of peer reviews was underscored as a protective measure for the town, especially in safeguarding water safety.

The board debated whether the town should bear these costs instead of the applicants, reflecting on the fairness and financial impact of the existing system. Despite recognizing the strain on applicants, it was emphasized that peer reviews are standard practice and should be anticipated in the application budget. A suggestion was made that it might be more equitable for the town’s funds to cover these reviews, with a member expressing a preference for utilizing town resources rather than “reaching directly into the applicant’s pocket.”

Discussions then moved to the approval of stormwater management permits, focusing on properties on Lemonster Road, 795 Lemonster Road, and Kilburn Street. These permits were closely scrutinized, with particular attention to soil conditions, groundwater levels, and runoff management. The board praised the applicants for their prompt responses to peer review comments, ultimately approving the permits for these properties with standard conditions. The need for ongoing maintenance of the stormwater systems was highlighted, and it was agreed that these requirements would be included in property deeds to ensure long-term compliance.

The meeting also tackled a proposed modification to the site plan approval for a property on Flat Hill Road, involving a 10×12 shed necessary for housing a sampler unit as part of the wastewater treatment facility. The board evaluated the proposal, noting the absence of additional construction and the minimal impact on traffic and the environment. This modification was approved smoothly, with the board recognizing it as a vital yet straightforward enhancement to the facility.

Further deliberations covered the stormwater management permit application for a property on Sunny Hill Road. The project aimed to construct a single-family home while addressing drainage issues from a previously rejected development plan. The board required a $2,000 peer review submission for this application. Concerns from residents about potential environmental impacts were acknowledged, with assurances that drainage plans complied with wetland management protocols.

In addition to these topics, the board discussed broader zoning amendments, such as the accessory dwelling unit bylaw and floodplain bylaw, in preparation for the upcoming town meeting. Clarifications regarding FEMA’s firm insurance map updates were provided, and a zoning workshop was scheduled for later in January to address these issues further.

A noteworthy part of the meeting involved addressing a recent Supreme Court decision on MBTA zoning, with implications for local regulatory processes. The board decided to proceed with public engagement and preparations for a fall town meeting, pending rectification from the state.

The meeting concluded with community updates, including discussions on zoning amendments by neighboring towns and reports from various committees. The board emphasized the need for clear communication and coordination, particularly in light of recent committee resignations affecting quorum requirements.