The public hearing for the seawall and pier project, initiated by a Notice of Intent from Gary Jefferson of the Katherine WS Jefferson 2009 Revocable Trust, dominated the meeting’s agenda. Jamie Binet from Zena Consulting Engineers provided crucial background, revealing that the construction, which included 159 feet of concrete, was undertaken without permits in a buffer and flood zone. This revelation raised immediate concerns about compliance with environmental regulations. The commission expressed unease over the unpermitted work, noting that although the concrete appeared stable, its legal status and potential environmental impact were problematic.

The commission faced the dilemma of addressing compensatory storage necessitated by the concrete structure. Binet outlined two potential solutions: removing the concrete, which could harm the environment, or finding alternative storage locations. The small size of the property, approximately 8,000 to 9,000 square feet, complicated these options, leading the commission to consider off-site mitigation possibilities. Members expressed a strong interest in conducting a site visit to better understand the project’s environmental impact.

An abutter’s attorney, Rachel Watsky, raised additional concerns about the compensatory storage and property boundaries, emphasizing that the project should not be treated as a “grandfathered issue.” Watsky questioned whether the fill was on the correct property due to deed descriptions and highlighted the challenges posed by fluctuating Long Pond water levels. Chapter 91 licensing for structures on state-controlled waters was deemed necessary, adding another layer of complexity to the situation.

The commission’s discussion also delved into drainage issues impacting 126 Rhode Island Road, following concerns from an abutter named Donna about potential flooding exacerbated by a new project. The discussion revealed that existing drainage conditions, altered in recent years, contributed to ongoing water management challenges. The project would increase impervious surface area significantly, requiring comprehensive drainage upgrades, including new catch basins and rerouted drainage pipes. Despite prior work to prevent stormwater from flowing onto Donna’s property, she expressed frustration over persistent flooding issues, questioning the effectiveness of the drainage system. Project representatives assured that the new design aimed to control stormwater flow effectively, but Donna remained skeptical.

The commission also addressed complications at Nine Cross Street, where a property owner was found to be filling land without adhering to a deed restriction. A cease-and-desist order was issued due to the absence of a recorded deed restriction, highlighting a breakdown in communication about legal responsibilities. The commission debated the proper procedure for handling deed restrictions, with members advocating for legal review by Town Council to ensure compliance and avoid future legal complications. The matter was deferred for further review.

Further deliberations included a review of ongoing permit applications and environmental testing concerns related to a junkyard in Lakeville. A participant expressed frustration over delays in water testing and communication, pointing out the prolonged timeline for addressing environmental concerns. The commission emphasized the importance of thorough investigations and collaborative efforts to resolve these issues, particularly regarding groundwater contamination and the operation of the junkyard.