The primary focus of the meeting was the potential relocation of the Andrews House, presented by Rick Haufer, Assistant Director of Public Works. Haufer outlined three potential sites for the relocation, each with its zoning and logistical challenges. The proposed sites included a small city-owned park on Northeast 6th Avenue, a CRA-owned lot on East Ocean Avenue, and a location on North Seacrest Boulevard. A project timeline estimated around 16 months for the relocation process, with budgetary estimates totaling approximately $375,000. The estimates did not include potential upgrades for ADA compliance and other necessary enhancements.

Public comments were dominated by concerns over the adequacy of proposed renovations and the building’s future use. Barbara Reedy, Chair of the Historic Resources Preservation Board, recommended that the city acquire ownership of the Andrews House and proposed using funds intended for demolition to aid in its relocation. She identified a specific site on Ocean Avenue as optimal and advocated for the building to be used for light commercial or public purposes. Susan Oyer, a member of the Move Historic Andrews House committee, criticized the city for a perceived lack of transparency and highlighted the economic development potential of preserving historic structures.

The Mayor expressed support for preservation efforts but stressed the need for a well-structured approach. The Mayor emphasized, “I just don’t want to rush it so that we end up doing it wrong,” indicating a preference for a collaborative process with local businesses.

Vice Mayor Kelley raised concerns about potential zoning issues at the Magnuson House site, while a city manager mentioned that adjustments could be made swiftly to meet fire separation regulations. Commissioner Hay echoed concerns about long-term maintenance costs and requested estimates for upkeep if the house remained in its current location. Tim Tack, Executive Director for the CRA, estimated annual maintenance costs at $10,000 to $15,000 to prevent further degradation.

The commission also discussed the legal complexities surrounding the property and the potential for establishing a historic district in Boynton Beach. A representative clarified that Community Redevelopment Agency (CRA) funds must be tied to clear economic development purposes. The possibility of creating an informational center or similar facility was suggested, emphasizing the need for a clear timeline and strategic approach.

A recurring theme throughout public comments was the desire to align the building’s preservation with Boynton Beach’s historical identity and aspirations for downtown revitalization. Former and current city officials, as well as community advocates, underscored the importance of engaging with the developer to prevent demolition and explore relocation options.

In response to the urgency expressed by community members, the Mayor and Vice Mayor weighed the necessity of moving the house promptly against the need for a deliberate planning process. Commissioner Cruz proposed a citywide survey to gather resident feedback on potential uses for the Andrews House.

As discussions continued, the commission recognized the need for further negotiation with the developer to secure an agreement delaying demolition. The Mayor suggested a feasibility study to assess the viability of relocating the house next to the Magnuson House, potentially using funds to hire an architect for a detailed survey.