A central topic of the meeting was the presentation of a bifurcation use variance application by Countryside Properties LLP, proposing a multifamily residential building specifically designated for senior citizens. The traffic analysis presented by the new expert, Michael Dy, compared the expected traffic from the senior housing to the previously approved office building use. Dy noted that the senior housing would generate less traffic, citing an approximate 90% reduction in trip generation compared to the office building. The senior housing would produce only five trips during the morning peak hour and six in the afternoon, as opposed to 75 and 71 trips respectively from the office use.

Concerns about traffic were not limited to trip generation. The methodology and credibility of traffic data collection were scrutinized, especially regarding counts conducted at critical intersections. French and Pello Associates, along with National Data Surveying Services, employed standard traffic engineering practices, which included both manual and automated counting methods. While the data was deemed consistent and valid, board members expressed a desire for more formalized documentation to ensure accountability and accuracy.

Safety concerns were raised concerning the intersection at Wells Road and Old York Road, where the proposed site would alter traffic flow. Resident Don Barnacle, though not testifying as a traffic expert, highlighted potential hazards, particularly the configuration of the site’s access point within a passing zone. He proposed an alternative driveway location to mitigate these risks. Barnacle’s observations included issues like speeding vehicles and sunlight obstructing visibility, complicating the decision-making process for drivers.

In addition to traffic and safety, the discussion also revolved around the enforcement of age restrictions and the adequacy of parking facilities. Questions were raised about how complaints related to age violations would be enforced, with the zoning officer expected to respond to such issues, often arising from community reports. The proposed development included sixty parking spaces for twenty-four units, exceeding the requirements set by the Residential Site Improvement Standards (RSIS). However, concerns were voiced about the allocation of guest versus resident spaces, particularly regarding accessibility for senior residents.

The proposed development’s impact on the community extended to considerations of zoning regulations and the township’s master plan. The planner for the project emphasized the senior housing as a less intensive use compared to the previous office buildings, aligning with zoning objectives by reducing traffic, noise, and visual disruption. The development, slated to include four affordable housing units, aimed to address local housing needs and contribute to the township’s affordable housing obligations.

Residents expressed concerns about the project’s long-term implications and its potential to exacerbate existing traffic and safety issues. Some suggested alternative uses for the property, such as a solar farm, that might minimize community disruption.

As the board deliberated, members acknowledged the public’s input, emphasizing that many concerns, particularly regarding site plan specifics like parking and accessibility, would be addressed in future reviews. The board moved to approve the use variance application following a unanimous vote, with plans to revisit detailed aspects during the site plan approval phase.

In the midst of these discussions, the board paused to honor Jackie Clap, the board’s stenographer for 52 years, who had recently passed away. A resolution highlighting her dedication and professionalism was read and adopted unanimously, with plans to present it to her family. Clap’s contributions were fondly remembered, underscoring her impact on the board and the community over her long tenure.