A major point of contention was the definitive plan and subdivision modification for a property on Hill Lane, where the applicant requested yet another extension. The need for this extension was attributed to unresolved requirements with the conservation department and the absence of sufficient board members at a previous zoning board meeting, which was essential for voting on a special permit. Concerns were raised about the proposed road layout modifications, specifically the applicant’s intention to create a shared driveway for multiple lots. The board members were apprehensive about proceeding without comprehensive input from the conservation department, particularly given the site’s proximity to wetlands and the potential for flooding.

Board members voiced their frustration with the applicant’s recurring plan changes. The board ultimately agreed to continue the public hearing for Hill Lane to the next meeting and imposed a 30-day extension on the subdivision application. They emphasized the necessity for the applicant to provide a coherent plan, free of frequent modifications, to facilitate progress.

Another topic was the Vera site plan review, which had also been subjected to multiple extensions. The applicant was reportedly waiting for architectural plans to meet historical review requirements, and there was uncertainty about whether these documents had been submitted. The board stressed the importance of maintaining the site plan’s validity, as allowing it to lapse could result in approval through inaction. A 30-day extension was proposed to ensure continuity in the review process, with members acknowledging the need for a quorum in upcoming meetings to avoid further delays.

The board also addressed the release of a covenant for Deal Way, following a member’s recusal due to a potential conflict of interest. The discussion involved reviewing the bond associated with the project and consulting with Town Council on the appropriate procedures under Massachusetts General Law. Town Council recommended allowing Mr. Sylvester to post a bond, which would secure performance for construction and municipal services. The board deliberated on an adequate timeline for project completion, ultimately setting a completion date of September 30, 2025, in alignment with the bond’s expiration.

The meeting also touched on a proposal for an extension related to petition number 24 S-244, which received unanimous support. Additionally, the board discussed financial matters, approving payments for engineering services and office supplies. There was notable discussion regarding a Starbucks site, where the building inspector had questioned ongoing work amid concerns about valid permits and conservation approvals. Members debated the necessity of three or four perk tests for the septic system and discussed sending a letter to the Board of Health for clarification on the status of approvals.

In a lighter moment, the board addressed a Class 2 online used motor vehicle sales license for a business on Industrial Drive. The board determined that no site plan review was necessary, provided the business adhered to regulations set by the Board of Selectmen and did not have vehicles present on-site.